Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Lady of Guadalupe ‘completely beyond' scientific explanation, says researcher
cna ^ | August 7, 2009

Posted on 08/07/2009 3:28:23 PM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: BelleAl
What a poseur

Poseur = Piece Of Sh*T

21 posted on 08/07/2009 5:38:01 PM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is an EVIL like no other, and must be ERADICATED. Barack OBORTION is a close second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Yes, it's Martin de Vos, a 16th century Belgian painter from Antwerp.

My favorite is his painting of St. Luke painting the Virgin's portrait:

(you know it's St. Luke by the bull. I do wonder if St. Luke is a self-portrait. I looked but didn't see a de Vos self-portrait on line, but St. Luke looks very Low Country to me.)

22 posted on 08/07/2009 7:20:42 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of Ye Chasse - TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Just superb. Thanks for the pic.


23 posted on 08/07/2009 7:49:44 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

At last. I’ve been wanting to ask a couple of questions of someone who has seen the original.

I have heard God-haters and Protestants alleging that there are visible brush marks on the image.

I would like to ask, if I may, were you close enough to have seen brush marks if they were there, and, if so, were there brush marks?

Oh, and are there enough commas in the paragraph above?


24 posted on 08/07/2009 8:01:20 PM PDT by dsc (The "t" in the word "often" is silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dsc
No, I couldn't see any brush strokes. The first two times I went, it was still in the old basilica, in a frame, and you could get very, very close. Now the tilma is in a large frame, under glass, with a spotlight on it, in the new basilica. I got as close as I could every time I was there, and couldn't see any brush marks. It is an amazing object. The colors remain fresh. I have been many times and it always moves me to tears. Being there at the basilica on December 12 is quite an experience, if you can tolerate huge crowds. I have been to Fatima and to Lourdes, as well, and Guadalupe seems the most tangible to me.

Why don't you go to Mexico City and see it? There's a lot of other things to do there, too, such as the Archaeology Museum, which I think is the best in the world, Teotehaucan, Chapultepec, the zoo and the castle, Xochimilco, all the Frida stuff.

25 posted on 08/07/2009 8:25:27 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

“Why don’t you go to Mexico City and see it?”

Soitenly. I’ll just dip a bucket into my money bin, and...


26 posted on 08/08/2009 2:32:57 PM PDT by dsc (The "t" in the word "often" is silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

But thanks for the reply. I’ve been wanting to ask somebody about that for a long time.


27 posted on 08/08/2009 2:36:25 PM PDT by dsc (The "t" in the word "often" is silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dsc

December 12th is the anniversary of the miracle i believe. And YES.... I do believe!


28 posted on 12/13/2009 5:01:51 PM PST by Bob Eimiller (appeasement "it's the idea that if you feed the alligator he will eat you last." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NYer; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

29 posted on 12/13/2009 5:05:45 PM PST by narses ('in an odd way this is cheering news!'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I hope to some day visit this miraculous image.


30 posted on 12/13/2009 5:29:26 PM PST by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
I saw a TV special yesterday on a Cornell Univ. PhD's computer enhancement of Our Lady of Guadalupe's eyes. Opthamologically correct reflections of of Juan Diego, the Bishop of the area at the time, a sitting Indian, a number of other people and, in Our lady's pupil a family with children.

He enhanced the reflections 2500 times... absolutely fascinating and, in my opinion impossible to refute.

31 posted on 12/13/2009 5:40:13 PM PST by Bob Eimiller (appeasement "it's the idea that if you feed the alligator he will eat you last." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Bob Eimiller

http://www.sancta.org/eyes.html


32 posted on 12/13/2009 5:41:08 PM PST by narses ('in an odd way this is cheering news!'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NYer

What I do not understand about this image is this: I have heard that when Mary miraculously created it, her image was on the cloak but that, later, artists painted in the golden rays around her. Is this true?

Why would humans think they could possibly improve the miraculous image in any way? How could one dare add a single thing to the image that appeared as Mary wanted it to be?


33 posted on 12/13/2009 5:49:28 PM PST by Melian ("Here's the moral of the story: Catholic witness has a cost." ~Archbishop Charles Chaput)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses

Yes.. Thanks I have seen that page.... I spent a few hours today reading everything i could find on the incredible miracle of the tilma


34 posted on 12/13/2009 5:52:22 PM PST by Bob Eimiller (appeasement "it's the idea that if you feed the alligator he will eat you last." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Melian

Never heard that... I’m quite sure it never happened.


35 posted on 12/13/2009 5:53:46 PM PST by Bob Eimiller (appeasement "it's the idea that if you feed the alligator he will eat you last." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Our Beautiful Lady of Guadalupe, please pray for us and keep us close.


36 posted on 12/13/2009 6:16:39 PM PST by BlueAngel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc

if you ask her to get you there, she will...


37 posted on 12/14/2009 4:31:23 AM PST by malkee (Actually I'm an ex-smoker--more than three years now -- But I think about it every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Our Lady’s humility in saying “yes” to God, and her selection by God to be the mother of Christ, are axiomatic and inspirational. She embodies “Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.” It was this sentiment that brought Christ into the world - no other could have, or can.

“Behold, the handmaid of the Lord; be it to me according to your word.”


38 posted on 12/14/2009 4:49:06 AM PST by Puddleglum ("due to the record harvest, rationing will continue as usual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melian
What I do not understand about this image is this: I have heard that when Mary miraculously created it, her image was on the cloak but that, later, artists painted in the golden rays around her. Is this true?

I have never heard that story, nor can I find anything on the internet to justify it. Here is a detailed description of the image and its significance and the results of scientific investigation. Notice, there are NO brush strokes.

     The Image of Our Lady is actually an Aztec
    Pictograph which was read and understood
quickly by the Aztec Indians. 

     1.    THE LADY STOOD IN FRONT OF
            THE SUN
            She was greater than the dreaded
            Huitzilopochtli, their sun-god of war.

     2.    HER FOOT RESTED ON THE
            CRESCENT MOON 
            She had clearly crushed Quetzalcoatl,
            the feathered serpent moon-
            god.                          

3.         THE STARS STREWN ACROSS
            THE MANTLE
            She was greater than the stars of heaven which they worshipped. 
            She was a virgin and the Queen of the heavens for Virgo rests over
            her womb and the northern crown upon her head. She appeared on
           December 12, 1531 and the stars that she wore are the constellations
           of the stars that appeared in the sky that day!

4.         THE BLUE‑GREEN HUE OF HER MANTLE
            She was a Queen because she wears the color of royalty.

5.         THE BLACK CROSS ON THE BROOCH AT HER NECK
            Her God was that of the Spanish Missionaries, Jesus Christ her son
            who died on the cross for all mankind.

6.         THE BLACK BELT
            She was with child because she wore the Aztec Maternity Belt.

7.         THE FOUR PETAL FLOWER OVER THE WOMB
            She was the Mother of God because the flower was a special sy
mbol
            of
life, movement and deity-the center of the universe.

8.         HER HANDS ARE JOINED IN PRAYER
            She was not God but clearly there was one greater than Her and she
            pointed her finger to the cross on her brooch.

9.         THE DESIGN ON HER ROSE COLORED GARMENT
            She is the Queen of the Earth because she is wearing a contour map
            of Mexico telling the Indians exactly where the apparition took place.

The Image of Our Lady of Guadalupe and Science

1.         The image to this date, cannot be explained by science.

2.         The image shows no sign of deterioration after 450 years!
            The tilma or cloak of Saint Juan Diego on which the image of Our
            Lady has been imprinted, is a coarse fabric made from the threads of
            the maguey cactus. This fiber disintegrates within 20-60 years! 

3.         There is no under sketch, no sizing and no protective over-varnish on
            the image.

4.         Microscopic examination revealed that there were no brush strokes.

5.         The image seems to increase in size and change colors due to an
            unknown property of the surface and substance of which it is made.

6.         According to Kodak of Mexico, the image is smooth and feels like
            a modern day photograph.  (Produced 300 years before the invention
            of photography.)

7.         The image has consistently defied exact reproduction, whether by
            brush or camera.

8.         Several images can be seen reflected in the eyes of the Virgin. It is  
            believed to be the images of Juan Diego, Bishop Juan de Zumarraga,
            Juan Gonzales, the interpreter and others.

9.         The distortion and place of the images are identical to what is
            produced in the normal eye which is impossible to obtain on a flat
            surface.

10.       The stars on Our Lady's Mantle coincide with the constellations in the
            sky on  December 12, 1531. All who have scientifically examined the
            image of Our Lady over the centuries confess that its properties are
            absolutely unique and so inexplicable in human terms that the image
            can only be supernatural!

39 posted on 12/14/2009 9:46:02 AM PST by NYer ("One Who Prays Is Not Afraid; One Who Prays Is Never Alone" - Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: malkee

“if you ask her to get you there, she will...”

Now, see, there’s the rub. People say to pray with confidence, and that you’ll get what you pray for. However, we all know that sometimes the answer to a prayer is, “No.”

It might not be the best thing for our eternal soul, or God might have reasons incomprehensible to mortal man. Whatever the case may be, we don’t get what we pray for, in the way we want it, or at the time we think we need it.

So, I might ask the Blessed Virgin to get me there, and might be told no.


40 posted on 12/14/2009 12:21:57 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson