Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 10/27/2009 12:40:43 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Childish behavior.



Skip to comments.

50 Reasons Why We Are Living In The End Times: Part 1
Lamb and Lion Ministries Blog ^ | 13 JULY 2009 | Dr. David R. Reagan

Posted on 07/25/2009 2:40:04 AM PDT by Quix

The Bible says we cannot know the time of the Lord's return (Matthew 25:13). But the Scriptures make it equally clear that we can know the season of the Lord's return (1 Thessalonians 5:2-6):

"You yourselves know full well that the day of the Lord will come just like a thief in the night... But you brethren, are not in darkness, that the day should overtake you like a thief; for you are all sons of light and sons of day. We are not of night or darkness; so then let us not sleep as others do, but let us be alert and sober."

This passage asserts that Jesus is coming like "a thief in the night." But then it proceeds to make it clear that this will be true only for the pagan world and not for believers. His return should be no surprise to those who know Him and His Word, for they have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit to give them understanding of the nature of the times.

Furthermore, the Scriptures give us signs to watch for — signs that will signal that Jesus is ready to return. The writer of the Hebrew letter referred to these signs when he proclaimed that believers should encourage one another when they see the day of judgment drawing near (Hebrews 10:25-27). Jesus also referred to the end time signs in His Olivet Discourse, given during the last week of His life (Matthew 24 and Luke 21). Speaking of a whole series of signs which He had given to His disciples, He said, "When you see all these things, recognize that He [the Son of Man — that is, Jesus] is near, right at the door" (Matthew 24:33).


A Personal Experience

Every time I think of "Signs of the Times," I am reminded of a great man of God named Elbert Peak. I had the privilege of participating with him in a Bible prophecy conference held in Orlando, Florida in the early 1990's. Mr. Peak was about 80 years old at the time.

He had been assigned the topic, "The Signs of the Times." He began his presentation by observing, "Sixty years ago when I first started preaching, you had to scratch around like a chicken to find one sign of the Lord's soon return."

He paused for a moment, and then added, "But today there are so many signs I'm no longer looking for them. Instead, I'm listening for a sound — the sound of a trumpet!"


The First Sign

One hundred years ago in 1907 there was not one single, tangible, measurable sign that indicated we were living in the season of the Lord's return. The first to appear was the Balfour Declaration which was issued by the British government on November 2, 1917.

This Declaration was prompted by the fact that during World War I the Turks sided with the Germans. Thus, when Germany lost the war, so did the Turks, and the victorious Allies decided to divide up both the German and Turkish empires.

The Turkish territories, called the Ottoman Empire, contained the ancient homeland of the Jewish people — an area the Romans had named Palestine after the last Jewish revolt in 132-135 AD.

In 1917 Palestine included all of modern day Israel and Jordan. In the scheme the Allies concocted for dividing up the German and Turkish territories, Britain was allotted Palestine, and this is what prompted the Balfour Declaration. In that document, Lord Balfour, the British Foreign Secretary, declared that it was the intention of the British government to establish in Palestine "a national home for the Jewish people."

The leading Evangelical in England at the time was F. B. Meyer. He immediately recognized the prophetic significance of the Declaration, for he was well aware that the Scriptures prophesy that the Jewish people will be regathered to their homeland in unbelief right before the return of the Messiah (Isaiah 11:11-12).

Meyer sent out a letter to the Evangelical leaders of England asking them to gather in London in December to discuss the prophetic implications of the Balfour Declaration. In that letter, he stated, "The signs of the times point toward the close of the time of the Gentiles... and the return of Jesus can be expected any moment."

Before Meyer's meeting could be convened, another momentous event occurred. On December 11, 1917 General Edmund Allenby liberated the city of Jerusalem from 400 years of Turkish rule.

There is no doubt that these events in 1917 marked the beginning of the end times because they led to the worldwide regathering of the Jewish people to their homeland and the reestablishment of their state.


Since 1917

Since the time of the Balfour Declaration, we have witnessed throughout the 20th Century the appearance of sign after sign pointing to the Lord's soon return. There are so many of these signs today, in fact, that one would have to be either biblically illiterate or spiritually blind not to realize that we are living on borrowed time.

I have personally been searching the Bible for years in an effort to identify all the signs, and it has not been an easy task to get a hold on them. That's because there are so many of them, both in the Old and New Testaments.

I have found that the best way to deal with them is to put them in categories, and in doing that, I have come up with six categories of end time signs. We will explore these catetories beginning in Part 2 of this series.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Charismatic Christian; Current Events; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: dispensation; endtimes; era; hallindsey; prophecy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,481-1,5001,501-1,5201,521-1,540 ... 1,681-1,695 next last
To: Marysecretary; Petronski; netmilsmom; trisham
I will never again mention names because of past problems with doing so. You should be able to figure it out from the posters.

I asked who is the "us" who is offended, I'm not asking you to name Catholics.

1,501 posted on 10/23/2009 10:00:45 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1493 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

>>Yes, that’s part of it.<<

Mighty self righteous of you to know who Our Lord forgives and who He does not.

I’m not going to presume the Mind of God.


1,502 posted on 10/23/2009 10:01:12 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1494 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
I guess that makes your correction of my typo “pedantic,” too.

It makes it "your own pedantic medicine." Slurp it up.

1,503 posted on 10/23/2009 10:01:18 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1499 | View Replies]

To: trisham
they rejected the term Theotokos (Giver of birth to God/Mother of God) as a title of the Virgin Mary, suggesting instead the title Christotokos (Giver of birth to Christ/Mother of Christ), because in their view he took only his human nature from his mother, while the divine Logos was pre-existent and external, so calling Mary “Mother of God” was misleading and potentially wrong.

And they are exactly right...Mary is NOT the mother of God...What a foolish statement...The second part of the Trinity existed before the foundation of the world...

I'd say the Nestorians rejected your religion as heretical long before you put the moniker on them...

Mother of God the Creator...Riiiiight...

1,504 posted on 10/23/2009 10:02:06 AM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1448 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
And they are exactly right...Mary is NOT the mother of God...

Nestorius, thy name is heretic.

1,505 posted on 10/23/2009 10:03:34 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1504 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
In fact, when stated that we ARE the Roman Catholic Church, we were told that we were thin skinned.

I thought you and Petronski belonged to the same religion...He swears up and down that he's not a Roman Catholic...In fact, he says there's no such thing as a Roman Catholic church...

1,506 posted on 10/23/2009 10:08:16 AM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1498 | View Replies]

To: Iscool; trisham; Petronski; Judith Anne; netmilsmom
You're at a disadvantage here...You're not speaking to Catholic aspirants who don't have a clue what God says...Or to other Catholics who as well, don't have a clue what God says...

So, you think that speaking to a Nestorian is advantageous?

In no way does Romans 11:11 imply that, "Jesus is ticked of and wants to make the Jews jealous...Jealous enough to turn the Jews to Him in the end... "

If you guys want to pat each other on the back by agreeing God was lying, have at it...

I'm not sure what Bible your sect reads, but I have NEVER seen a Bible that implies that ANYONE other than St. Paul the Apostle wrote the Epistle to the Romans.

1,507 posted on 10/23/2009 10:08:33 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1496 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
In fact, he says there's no such thing as a Roman Catholic Church...

Bzzzt. False again.

You're just not very good with being factual, are you?

Rebuking God's gifts of logic and common sense is dangerous stuff.

1,508 posted on 10/23/2009 10:10:01 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1506 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

Sorry, just using the title that is given to us by so many here.

I’m actually Latin Rite Catholic.

My mistake.


1,509 posted on 10/23/2009 10:10:44 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1506 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Sorry, just using the title that is given to us by so many here.

It's certainly the one protestants expect to hear.

1,510 posted on 10/23/2009 10:11:39 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1509 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

CANON VII.-If any one saith, that all works done before Justification, in whatsoever way they be done, are truly sins, or merit the hatred of God; or that the more earnestly one strives to dispose himself for grace, the more grievously he sins: let him be anathema.

CANON IX.-If any one saith, that by faith alone the impious is justified; in such wise as to mean, that nothing else is required to co-operate in order to the obtaining the grace of Justification, and that it is not in any way necessary, that he be prepared and disposed by the movement of his own will; let him be anathema.

CANON X.-If any one saith, that men are just without the justice of Christ, whereby He merited for us to be justified; or that it is by that justice itself that they are formally just; let him be anathema.

CANON XII.-If any one saith, that justifying faith is nothing else but confidence in the divine mercy which remits sins for Christ’s sake; or, that this confidence alone is that whereby we are justified; let him be anathema.

CANON XIII.-If any one saith, that it is necessary for every one, for the obtaining the remission of sins, that he believe for certain, and without any wavering arising from his own infirmity and disposition, that his sins are forgiven him; let him be anathema.

CANON XVIII.-If any one saith, that the commandments of God are, even for one that is justified and constituted in grace, impossible to keep; let him be anathema.

CANON XIX.-If any one saith, that nothing besides faith is commanded in the Gospel; that other things are indifferent, neither commanded nor prohibited, but free; or, that the ten commandments nowise appertain to Christians; let him be anathema.

CANON XXI.-If any one saith, that Christ Jesus was given of God to men, as a redeemer in whom to trust, and not also as a legislator whom to obey; let him be anathema.

CANON XXIV.-If any one saith, that the justice received is not preserved and also increased before God through good works; but that the said works are merely the fruits and signs of Justification obtained, but not a cause of the increase thereof; let him be anathema.

CANON XXV.-If any one saith, that, in every good work, the just sins venially at least, or-which is more intolerable still-mortally, and consequently deserves eternal punishments; and that for this cause only he is not damned, that God does not impute those works unto damnation; let him be anathema.

CANON XXIX.-If any one saith, that he, who has fallen after baptism, is not able by the grace of God to rise again; or, that he is able indeed to recover the justice which he has lost, but by faith alone without the sacrament of Penance, contrary to what the holy Roman and universal Church-instructed by Christ and his Apostles-has hitherto professed, observed, and taught; let him be anathema.

CANON XXX.-If any one saith, that, after the grace of Justification has been received, to every penitent sinner the guilt is remitted, and the debt of eternal punishment is blotted out in such wise, that there remains not any debt of temporal punishment to be discharged either in this world, or in the next in Purgatory, before the entrance to the kingdom of heaven can be opened (to him); let him be anathema.

CANON XXXII.-If any one saith, that the good works of one that is justified are in such manner the gifts of God, as that they are not also the good merits of him that is justified; or, that the said justified, by the good works which he performs through the grace of God and the merit of Jesus Christ, whose living member he is, does not truly merit increase of grace, eternal life, and the attainment of that eternal life,-if so be, however, that he depart in grace,-and also an increase of glory; let him be anathema.


As William Tyndale was strangled and burned for saying ‘the fruit declares the tree good or bad but does not make it good or bad’.

Or as Martin Luther put it, ‘But to fulfill the law means to do its work eagerly, lovingly and freely, without the constraint of the law; it means to live well and in a manner pleasing to God, as though there were no law or punishment. It is the Holy Spirit, however, who puts such eagerness of unconstained love into the heart, as Paul says in chapter 5. But the Spirit is given only in, with, and through faith in Jesus Christ, as Paul says in his introduction. So, too, faith comes only through the word of God, the Gospel, that preaches Christ: how he is both Son of God and man, how he died and rose for our sake. Paul says all this in chapters 3, 4 and 10.

That is why faith alone makes someone just and fulfills the law; faith it is that brings the Holy Spirit through the merits of Christ. The Spirit, in turn, renders the heart glad and free, as the law demands. Then good works proceed from faith itself. That is what Paul means in chapter 3 when, after he has thrown out the works of the law, he sounds as though the wants to abolish the law by faith. No, he says, we uphold the law through faith, i.e. we fulfill it through faith.”

Or as the Apostle Paul put it, “But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us, even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ— by grace you have been saved— and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, so that in the coming ages he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.”

Or as Jesus put it, “Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.”


1,511 posted on 10/23/2009 10:12:04 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1490 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

And actually, I’ve been corrected many a time by the Eastern Rite Catholics, Lord Love them!


1,512 posted on 10/23/2009 10:12:22 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1506 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Catholic doctrine does not teach salvation by works.


1,513 posted on 10/23/2009 10:12:56 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1511 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
As William Tyndale was strangled and burned for saying ‘the fruit declares the tree good or bad but does not make it good or bad’.

He was strangled by a protestant named Henry VIII.

1,514 posted on 10/23/2009 10:13:45 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1511 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

What is “Salvation by Works”?


1,515 posted on 10/23/2009 10:14:11 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1513 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

No, I didn’t see it and I cannot imagine slamming someone asking for prayer.

However, beating up on someone for their beliefs on FR is hardly a Protestant sin that no Catholic can conceive of...


1,516 posted on 10/23/2009 10:14:52 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1497 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

Sorry, that’s not making it personal.


1,517 posted on 10/23/2009 10:14:53 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1495 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

The heretical suggestion that one’s works can merit one’s salvation.

Faith AND works are required.


1,518 posted on 10/23/2009 10:15:10 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1515 | View Replies]

To: Petronski; netmilsmom
It's certainly the one protestants expect to hear.

I think they would love it if we used RCC. They would be overjoyed if we would call ourselves a "den of vipers" or the "whore of Babylon".

1,519 posted on 10/23/2009 10:21:49 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1510 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers; Judith Anne; Hegewisch Dupa; Petronski

Here is where Judith Anne posted a new thread in religion and asking to have the first removed because it was heinous.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2368428/posts

No, you can try to find some relativism in all this but Catholics don’t bash Protestants who ask for prayers. If you actually go onto that thread, some are STILL trying to link back to the original thread.

That’s low.


1,520 posted on 10/23/2009 10:22:23 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1516 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,481-1,5001,501-1,5201,521-1,540 ... 1,681-1,695 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson