Actually, you didn't deny it - that would have been a definite position statement. What you did was call into question my linking of the two sentences you wrote together.
You throw around words like slander, you don't speak openly about issues you bring up on a discussion board, and then you announce you don't care. If this is a defense of Catholic teachings, it's no wonder so many people believe in Mary's divinity. If it's not a defense of Catholic teachings, then why would you consider my observations of a historic fact to be slanderous? By what standard?
Again, you cannot simply put your words in my mouth and expect me to play along.
...why would you consider my observations of a historic fact...
You made no "observations of a historic fact." You made a claim.
...to be slanderous?
You are falsely assigning a grave sin to millions of Catholics. That is slander.
As I made clear, the part I don't care about is how absolutely smoked you are that I won't let you cram your words in my mouth.