Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Quix
I still find that the encyclical seems to talk out of both sides of someone’s fingers on globalism.

Can you give a specific example Quix?

102 posted on 07/13/2009 8:26:45 AM PDT by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: betty boop

Please see my post on the Papal . . . thread.

It will be a while before I can respond with examples as you ask. Sorry.

Basically, he’s saying that there must be a global economic governmental authority.


There’s no way such a global authority can be other than part and parcel of the satanic global government already well in power covertly for many decades—over 100 years.

The Pope MUST have known that or he and his staff are grossly uninformed and grossly incompetent.

Said governmental authority will be tyrannical and a bastardized form of Communism married to a bastardized form of capitalism.


Yet the Pope talks about how all such must be governed by morality, in love . . . essentially “for the children” yada yada yada.

There’s no way the satanic global oligarchy will do anything apart from or inconsistent with their satanic goals from hell.

The Pope can publish encyclicals hourly and it won’t change that fact.

The Pope MUST know that. Yet he straddles the fence in several places in this doc—speaking essentially—out of both sides of his fingers.


112 posted on 07/13/2009 10:04:58 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson