Sorry, but what I wrote was based on what you and Poe wrote. I’m tired of this mind-reader accusation. Take responsibility for what you write. You accused the pope of favoring one-world government, world-empire etc. and then you explain those who insist that’s not what the pope did of covering up for him, of denying the (to you) obvious import of the document.
Why can’t you simply recognize that you read the encyclical differently? Why must you attribute bad faith to those who think the encyclical does not advocate one-world government in the sense that you think it does?
Certainly we read the document differently.
However, some folks fail to notice that there are chronic addicted apologists who would likely absolve the Pope of any sin or guilt were he
[QUITE HYPOTHETICALLY FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY]
to claim in a formal infallible document that fantasies of lewd conduct were a new religious rite.
There really is that level of disconnect from eality evident on the part of some folks on these threads.
At this point from the evidence presented, it is inescapable that the Pope is advocating some level of global oversight, governance, management etc. of at least some aspects of the world economic system . . . of course . . . as usual, in globalist terms . . .
—for love and truth
—for the children
—for the environment
—for the planet
. . .
. . .
yada
yada
yada
I’m not willing to write out of the Vatican RUBBER DICTIONARY of DIPLO-SPEAK AND WEASEL WORDS.
Folks who think it’s wonderful to do so will have to take responsibility for doing so at some point.