[Zionist Conspirator]

Ping.

[steve-b]

Discovery Institute Twaddle Alert

[RegulatorCountry]

Well, well. Ol’ Larry knows there’s something to accomodate alright:

“But when you look at CMB map, you also see that the structure that is observed, is in fact, in a weird way, correlated with the plane of the earth around the sun. Is this Copernicus coming back to haunt us? That’s crazy. We’re looking out at the whole universe. There’s no way there should be a correlation of structure with our motion of the earth around the sun — the plane of the earth around the sun — the ecliptic. That would say we are truly the center of the universe.” -Lawrence Krauss

http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/krauss06/krauss06.2_index.html

[ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY]

“...the basic Judeo-Christian belief that the human face and body mysteriously reflect the image of a non-corporeal God.”

I don't know what religion the author is, but THAT is NOT what Judeo-Christianity teaches!

Spiritual image; NOT corporeal!

[xzins]

No matter how you slice it, a purely mechanistic view of this world will produce hopeless, unimaginable, cruelty and brutality in a struggle(s) for domination.

For what difference would cruelty and brutality make?

Despite the brains that say otherwise, design is obvious even to the unbeliever. Paul says so.

They know.

And for those who have “ears to hear” as 2 sisters are wont to remind, there is entry into the glorious Kingdom of God.

[count-your-change]

The Darwinists want that pinch of incense from everyone.
A person can believe (for now) what they want but they and their children must never express doubt of the central dogma of The Temple of Darwinism. that’s really what NOMA is.

[GodGunsGuts]

Ping!

[GourmetDan]

"In a recent Wall Street Journal opinion article, cosmologist Lawrence Krauss declared “the inconsistency of belief in an activist god with modern science.”"

I see an assertion, but no argument or evidence.

Anyone know what his argument or evidence was to support that statement?

Or does it simply depend on his use of the word 'activist' and the definition thereof?

[GourmetDan]

"This is despite the fact that both men strenuously deny that there can be any empirical evidence of God’s creativity in nature."

I suppose that the atom (three particles combined into one quantum entity) isn't empirical evidence of the Trinity?

[onedoug]

There's no conflict whatsoever between the scientific method and my theology.
Israel means to struggle with God. Ethical science, both pure and applied, amplifies and simplifies that struggle.
Gut shabbos!

[editor-surveyor]

“The light shined into the darkness, and the darkness comprehended it not”

[tpanther]

“Of course, it wasn’t always like this”.

But you wouldn’t know that from the posts from the cultists here who were thoroughly indoctrinated by the mess that is public schools, ruined by the ACLU and NEA with their ideology of multiple God hang-ups.

[SunkenCiv]

Accommodationists hold that even atheists should present science to the public as an intellectual activity compatible with religion. Critics of this position include those like University of Chicago biologist Jerry Coyne, who lashes out at the accommodationists because, as he wrote in an essay in The New Republic, "a true harmony between science and religion requires either doing away with most people's religion and replacing it with a watered-down deism, or polluting science with unnecessary, untestable, and unreasonable spiritual claims."