Without this, despite the great progress accomplished in various sectors, international law would risk being conditioned by the balance of power among the strongest nations. The integral development of peoples and international cooperation require the establishment of a greater degree of international ordering, marked by subsidiarity, for the management of globalization[149]. They also require the construction of a social order that at last conforms to the moral order, to the interconnection between moral and social spheres, and to the link between politics and the economic and civil spheres...
If you have a government that can impose its will on all below it...it is a government. Look at how well we, with the Constitution, have subsidiary’ today.
Yes, but what does that mean??? Looks to me your pope is for globalization as long as the ruling elite are a small group of leaders with ultimate authority as opposed to a conglomeration of ruling nations...Just like your religion...
Which of the two will win out. Decision making at the lowest level, or a global bureaucracy with the power to enforce it's mandates? Your Pope wants both and neither is compatible with the other.
Why not support free markets?