You should be telling the secular revolutionary evolutionists to leave your church alone...not those who champion the traditional Catholic interpretation of Genesis.
And speaking of Galileo:
The Galileo affair: history or heroic hagiography?
http://creation.com/the-galileo-affair-history-or-heroic-hagiography
Minority and NOT the POPE
so predictable GGG.So the church wasn’t motivated by control of information and knowledge? The church was/isn’t still trying to discredit or spin new knowledge that doesn’t fit into their written-in-concrete, dogmatic conclusions?
Please-enjoy your day on the boat, but don’t for one second think that you apply the same rules of inquiry to religious based claims as you do to claims based on the scientific method. Once again with religion the conclusions are the dogma, with science the process is the dogma. The scientific process will eventually find the truth based on evidence. The religious conclusions have no room to change and accommodate new information. your choice
O, and which creation myth does the church believe in now? I think there are 2 different creation accounts in Genesis!
Fair winds