To: Dr. Eckleburg
Isn't it strange how some RCs cannot bring themselves to admit even the tiniest flaw in Peter?And then they cut and paste a 20,000 word dissertation defending their position which generally has nothing to do with the topic at hand to try to sidetrack you...
Some of these people are so crooked they probably have to screw their socks on in the morning...
555 posted on
06/29/2009 6:21:14 AM PDT by
Iscool
(I don't understand all that I know...)
To: Iscool
Some of these people are so crooked they probably have to screw their socks on in the morning...
I see you are "setting a tone for discussion" here....
In empirical studies in forensics, insulting an opponent in a debate has been shown to discredit the message of the debator. The audience tends to perceive it as a failure of the communicator to mount an otherwise reasonable defense of his or her position, instead resorting to irrational, ad hominem attacks. They are right.
572 posted on
06/29/2009 7:55:39 AM PDT by
bdeaner
(The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson