Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MarkBsnr
There is no evidence that the letters of Paul, written before most of the rest of the NT, were written by him with the understanding that they would be considered Scripture.

Yes, Paul would not assume his words would carry the impact of those of the rest of Scripture; oh that the office of the Pope - with his ex cathedra claims - were so humble.

420 posted on 06/28/2009 5:07:19 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies ]


To: PugetSoundSoldier
oh that the office of the Pope - with his ex cathedra claims - were so humble.

Well he IS the vicar of Christ, you know...

428 posted on 06/28/2009 5:29:29 PM PDT by papertyger (A difference that makes no difference is no difference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies ]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

***There is no evidence that the letters of Paul, written before most of the rest of the NT, were written by him with the understanding that they would be considered Scripture.

Yes, Paul would not assume his words would carry the impact of those of the rest of Scripture; oh that the office of the Pope - with his ex cathedra claims - were so humble.***

Sorry if you disagree with Jesus. Your privilege. See how free will works both ways?


739 posted on 06/29/2009 6:55:18 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson