Who says I don’t? And by the way I do not think of Genesis as myth , except in the sense that science is myth.
Oh, so you subject the "new testament" to the same withering skepticism as the "old?" Well, that's consistent, I must admit. But this raises the question of why you exempt transubstantiation from this withering skepticism. Do you only believe it because the "fundies" don't? If they believed it would you be as skeptical of it as you are of Noah's Flood?