Sitetest, I have come to the conclusion that since what Tiller was doing was perfectly legal under the law, that he was not a murderer and that Scott Roeder, who cut him down in his prime is a murderer.
I'm done arguing on Roeder's behalf. He's a monster who killed an innocent man in cold blood.
Tiller was a model citizen and a good church going man who was providing a needed medical service that few doctors were willing to do. He contributed to his church and he probably funded a lot of charities and little leagues and did all manner of good within the Wichita community.
Thank you for helping me to see the error of my ways. The rule of law is the most important virtue that America has. In accordance with that rule of law, abortion is nothing more than a medical procedure protected by the constitution of the United States. Roeder was a monster to think that Tiller deserved death. It is Roeder who deserves death, as the law calls for the execution of murderers. It does not allow for the execution of medical providers.
If I believed that that's what you actually now thought, then we would differ signficantly.
You seem to only see a light switch - it's either on or off. Either Tiller was a bad guy and Roeder is a good guy, or Tiller was a good guy and Roeder is a bad guy.
Another false dichotomy.
sitetest