You replying to #125. Near the end of #125, I offer some alternatives to the concept of ‘if they stop buying I stop selling’. That’s too simplistic, and the more complicated flow of events invalidates your assumption in #127 that if I’ve accepted one I’ve accepted the other.
In the specific case at hand, as I’ve explained upthread more than once, there are multiple factors involved in consumer purchasing decisions. You’re over-simplifying. Nobody has yet made the case that consumers are rejecting large portion food items. If that case were made, it would have to include isolation of the reason for the rejection to the one individual factor, large portions.
Life is complicated. So is this issue.
If you’re going to say it’s too simplistic then you aren’t accepting it as true. So now you’re recanting from what you said in 115. Thanks you just proved that you’re really just arguing to argue. We’re done.