Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Campion
I found a primary source on Innitzer's trip to Rome: an article from Time Magazine, 4/18/1938.

Thanks for the reference. I would imagine that, since Toland's book is meant to be a biography of Hitler (and not the Church or other parties), that Toland wouldn't have followed up on Innitzer, because (it should go without saying) the book is not a biography of Innitzer, but of Hitler. If later events had showed Innitzer crossing paths meaningfully with Hitler again, Toland's book would have covered them.

17 posted on 05/14/2009 9:00:50 PM PDT by Alex Murphy (Presbyterians often forget that John Knox had been a Sunday bowler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Alex Murphy

Of course. I just wanted to make it clear that Innitzer’s Nazi sympathies were not well-received by his superiors, and he didn’t stay on the Nazis’ good side for long, either.


18 posted on 05/14/2009 9:11:27 PM PDT by Campion ("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed Imposter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson