Posted on 04/21/2009 6:10:33 PM PDT by chase19
RON HOWARD LIES ABOUT ANGELS & DEMONS
April 21, 2009
Ron Howard, director of Angels & Demons, the movie version of Dan Browns book by that name, attacked Catholic League president Bill Donohue yesterday on the Huffington Post.
Referring to a booklet on the movie that Donohue authored, Angels & Demons: More Demonic than Angelic, (click here) Howard wrote: Mr. Donohues booklet accuses us of lying when our movie trailer says the Catholic Church ordered a brutal massacre to silence the Illuminati centuries ago. It would be a lie if we had ever suggested our movie is anything other than a work of fiction . Howard also said that most in the hierarchy of the Church will enjoy his film; he denies being anti-Catholic.
Donohue responded today:
Dan Brown says in his book that the Illuminati are factual and that they were hunted ruthlessly by the Catholic Church. In the films trailer, Tom Hanks, who plays the protagonist Robert Langdon, says The Catholic Church ordered a brutal massacre to silence them forever. Howard concurs: The Illuminati were formed in the 1600s. They were artists and scientists like Galileo and Bernini, whose progressive ideas threatened the Vatican.
All of this is a lie. The Illuminati were founded in 1776 and were dissolved in 1787. It is obvious that Galileo and Bernini could not possibly have been members: Galileo died in 1647 and Bernini passed away in 1680. More important, the Catholic Church never hunted, much less killed, a single member of the Illuminati. But this hasnt stopped Brown from asserting that It is a historical fact that the Illuminati vowed vengeance against the Vatican in the 1600s. (My emphasis.)
Howard must be delusional if he thinks Vatican officials are going to like his propagandathey denied him the right to film on their grounds. Moreover, we know from a Canadian priest who hung out with Howards crew last summer in Rome (dressed in civilian clothes) just how much they hate Catholicism. Its time to stop the lies and come clean.
Thank you for the reply.
When Opie and all his former co-stars made that ad for Soetoro, that told me all I needed to know: they are all baby-killing Catholic-haters.
Now Opie and Brown are back to their old two-step—claiming its all factual, and when someone challenges any of their “facts,” then “it’s just a novel/movie.”
Minor nit.
There was no “crusade” waged against the Templars, except possibly in the metaphorical sense of any war or campaign being a crusade.
The attack on the Templars was instigated and implemented primarily by the King of France, although various Church leaders were quite happy to share in the spoils and allowed themselves to be used as cover for the nakedly mercenary motivation of the King.
It may not have been a crusade in the strictest sense of the word but it did involve charges of heresy, burning at the stake, the Church, and the Pope so, in a sense, it was a crusade invoked to suppress infidels (alleged infidels); although, you and I know otherwise of course, that this was a way to get out of paying off debts to Templars and to secure their reputed treasure (which never turned up according to my sources) and later went on to become the inspiration behind my favorite movie, National Treasure. If you haven’t read “the Lost Treasure of the Knights Templar”, By Steven Sora, I would reccomend it as it provides interesting speculations on the post Phillip Templar Knight history.
LOL, that's a good question! But whatever you do, don't hold your breath waiting; Opie knows only Christianity is fair game in Hollywood, and he's a gutless wonder when it comes to attacking Islam.
He's a whining publicity hound.
I and around a billion others thought it was great.
I guess Howard skipped history classes at his studio school.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.