You said — And, if this thread follows the usual course, before long some thoroughgoing heretics will chime in in support of dispensationalist interpretation.
—
What do you mean “before long”... it *started* that way with the posting of this thread... LOL...
You’re the one who is denying that Israel has anything to do with future events in the Bible and that Israel is of no more significance in the Bible than any other nation is of significance... :-)
We’ll see who is right as these prophecies of the Bible work out in real-life, in the world — or rather see if your “absence of future prophecies” works out... (ummm..., how does the “absence of future prophecies” work out... I guess “nothing” happens, that the Bible says about these prophecies, because according to you it’s all happened with Israel already... [a double-LOL here...])....
You said — And, if this thread follows the usual course, before long some thoroughgoing heretics will chime in in support of dispensationalist interpretation.—
What do you mean “before long”... it *started* that way with the posting of this thread... LOL...
Oh??? What sort are you? What we usually see chiming in are legalistic Judaizers and non-trinitarians. And those who see no problem with consorting with them.
You’re the one who is denying that Israel has anything to do with future events in the Bible and that Israel is of no more significance in the Bible than any other nation is of significance... :-)
I assume you've read Paul's epistle to the Romans, at least once. We could start there.
or rather see if your “absence of future prophecies” works out...
Have you ever actually read anything by anyone who's not a dispensationalist? Outside of people like Peter, Paul, John, Luke, Moses, Isaiah, etc., that is.