Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Israeli Jewish schools, no teaching about Christianity
CNS ^ | April 17, 2009 | Judith Sudilovsky

Posted on 04/17/2009 1:44:53 PM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-254 last
To: Poe White Trash
The fundamental distinction between the works of the law and salvation by Grace is drawn by St. Paul most fully in Galatians:

16 But knowing that man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ; we also believe in Christ Jesus, that we may be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: because by the works of the law no flesh shall be justified. 17 But if while we seek to be justified in Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners; is Christ then the minister of sin? God forbid. 18 For if I build up again the things which I have destroyed, I make myself a prevaricator. 19 For I, through the law, am dead to the law, that I may live to God: with Christ I am nailed to the cross. 20 And I live, now not I; but Christ liveth in me. And that I live now in the flesh: I live in the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and delivered himself for me. 21 I cast not away the grace of God. For if justice be by the law, then Christ died in vain.

(Gal 2)

This is what the Catechism has to say (sorry, long):

II. THE OLD LAW

God, our Creator and Redeemer, chose Israel for himself to be his people and revealed his Law to them, thus preparing for the coming of Christ. The Law of Moses expresses many truths naturally accessible to reason. These are stated and authenticated within the covenant of salvation.

The Old Law is the first stage of revealed Law. Its moral prescriptions are summed up in the Ten Commandments. The precepts of the Decalogue lay the foundations for the vocation of man fashioned in the image of God; they prohibit what is contrary to the love of God and neighbor and prescribe what is essential to it. The Decalogue is a light offered to the conscience of every man to make God's call and ways known to him and to protect him against evil:

God wrote on the tables of the Law what men did not read in their hearts.13

According to Christian tradition, the Law is holy, spiritual, and good,14 yet still imperfect. Like a tutor15 it shows what must be done, but does not of itself give the strength, the grace of the Spirit, to fulfill it. Because of sin, which it cannot remove, it remains a law of bondage. According to St. Paul, its special function is to denounce and disclose sin, which constitutes a "law of concupiscence" in the human heart.16 However, the Law remains the first stage on the way to the kingdom. It prepares and disposes the chosen people and each Christian for conversion and faith in the Savior God. It provides a teaching which endures for ever, like the Word of God.

The Old Law is a preparation for the Gospel. "The Law is a pedagogy and a prophecy of things to come."17 It prophesies and presages the work of liberation from sin which will be fulfilled in Christ: it provides the New Testament with images, "types," and symbols for expressing the life according to the Spirit. Finally, the Law is completed by the teaching of the sapiential books and the prophets which set its course toward the New Covenant and the Kingdom of heaven.

There were . . . under the regimen of the Old Covenant, people who possessed the charity and grace of the Holy Spirit and longed above all for the spiritual and eternal promises by which they were associated with the New Law. Conversely, there exist carnal men under the New Covenant still distanced from the perfection of the New Law: the fear of punishment and certain temporal promises have been necessary, even under the New Covenant, to incite them to virtuous works. In any case, even though the Old Law prescribed charity, it did not give the Holy Spirit, through whom "God's charity has been poured into our hearts."18

III. THE NEW LAW OR THE LAW OF THE GOSPEL

The New Law or the Law of the Gospel is the perfection here on earth of the divine law, natural and revealed. It is the work of Christ and is expressed particularly in the Sermon on the Mount. It is also the work of the Holy Spirit and through him it becomes the interior law of charity: "I will establish a New Covenant with the house of Israel. . . . I will put my laws into their hands, and write them on their hearts, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people."19

The New Law is the grace of the Holy Spirit given to the faithful through faith in Christ. It works through charity; it uses the Sermon on the Mount to teach us what must be done and makes use of the sacraments to give us the grace to do it:

If anyone should meditate with devotion and perspicacity on the sermon our Lord gave on the mount, as we read in the Gospel of Saint Matthew, he will doubtless find there . . . the perfect way of the Christian life. . . . This sermon contains . . . all the precepts needed to shape one's life.20

The Law of the Gospel "fulfills," refines, surpasses, and leads the Old Law to its perfection.21 In the Beatitudes, the New Law fulfills the divine promises by elevating and orienting them toward the "kingdom of heaven." It is addressed to those open to accepting this new hope with faith - the poor, the humble, the afflicted, the pure of heart, those persecuted on account of Christ and so marks out the surprising ways of the Kingdom.

The Law of the Gospel fulfills the commandments of the Law. The Lord's Sermon on the Mount, far from abolishing or devaluing the moral prescriptions of the Old Law, releases their hidden potential and has new demands arise from them: it reveals their entire divine and human truth. It does not add new external precepts, but proceeds to reform the heart, the root of human acts, where man chooses between the pure and the impure,22 where faith, hope, and charity are formed and with them the other virtues. The Gospel thus brings the Law to its fullness through imitation of the perfection of the heavenly Father, through forgiveness of enemies and prayer for persecutors, in emulation of the divine generosity.23

The New Law practices the acts of religion: almsgiving, prayer and fasting, directing them to the "Father who sees in secret," in contrast with the desire to "be seen by men."24 Its prayer is the Our Father.25

The Law of the Gospel requires us to make the decisive choice between "the two ways" and to put into practice the words of the Lord.26 It is summed up in the Golden Rule, "Whatever you wish that men would do to you, do so to them; this is the law and the prophets."27

The entire Law of the Gospel is contained in the "new commandment" of Jesus, to love one another as he has loved us.28

To the Lord's Sermon on the Mount it is fitting to add the moral catechesis of the apostolic teachings, such as Romans 12-15, 1 Corinthians 12-13, Colossians 3-4, Ephesians 4-5, etc. This doctrine hands on the Lord's teaching with the authority of the apostles, particularly in the presentation of the virtues that flow from faith in Christ and are animated by charity, the principal gift of the Holy Spirit. "Let charity be genuine. . . . Love one another with brotherly affection. . . . Rejoice in your hope, be patient in tribulation, be constant in prayer. Contribute to the needs of the saints, practice hospitality."29 This catechesis also teaches us to deal with cases of conscience in the light of our relationship to Christ and to the Church.30

The New Law is called a law of love because it makes us act out of the love infused by the Holy Spirit, rather than from fear; a law of grace, because it confers the strength of grace to act, by means of faith and the sacraments; a law of freedom, because it sets us free from the ritual and juridical observances of the Old Law, inclines us to act spontaneously by the prompting of charity and, finally, lets us pass from the condition of a servant who "does not know what his master is doing" to that of a friend of Christ - "For all that I have heard from my Father I have made known to you" - or even to the status of son and heir.31

Besides its precepts, the New Law also includes the evangelical counsels. The traditional distinction between God's commandments and the evangelical counsels is drawn in relation to charity, the perfection of Christian life. The precepts are intended to remove whatever is incompatible with charity. The aim of the counsels is to remove whatever might hinder the development of charity, even if it is not contrary to it.32

The evangelical counsels manifest the living fullness of charity, which is never satisfied with not giving more. They attest its vitality and call forth our spiritual readiness. The perfection of the New Law consists essentially in the precepts of love of God and neighbor. The counsels point out the more direct ways, the readier means, and are to be practiced in keeping with the vocation of each:

[God] does not want each person to keep all the counsels, but only those appropriate to the diversity of persons, times, opportunities, and strengths, as charity requires; for it is charity, as queen of all virtues, all commandments, all counsels, and, in short, of all laws and all Christian actions that gives to all of them their rank, order, time, and value.33

THE MORAL LAW


241 posted on 05/05/2009 7:18:02 AM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: kosta50
The Bible as a whole, minus St. Paul, treats these punitive fires as real fires.

We were talking about purgatorial fire, not punitive fire, were we not?

242 posted on 05/05/2009 9:09:48 AM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: annalex
We were talking about purgatorial fire, not punitive fire, were we not?

Many a Catholic theologian and pope considered them one and the same, even calling them punishment unlike anything seen on earth. It's only after Vatican II that the purgatorial fires became cleansing, rather than "roasting" sinners to God's "satifaction" (remember Anselm's thinking?).

243 posted on 05/05/2009 9:53:27 AM PDT by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: kosta50

Yes, I remember Anselm’s thinking; the links to his book are on my FR profile. He never taught any such thing, nor anyone else Catholic.


244 posted on 05/05/2009 9:55:55 AM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: annalex

I remember reading Catholic theologians and popes proclaim the suffering in the purgatory will exceed anything on earth. Hardly just a “scrubbing” of the soul! If that line of thinking didn’t come from Anselm’s idea of divine satisfaction where did it come from? The East? I don’t think so, Alex.


245 posted on 05/05/2009 4:02:49 PM PDT by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: kosta50

St. Anselm specifically said that no human suffering can satisfy the offence for which Christ atoned.
Neither the purgatorial suffering — whatever its intensity — or the damnation to Hell have anything to do with atonement for sins.


246 posted on 05/05/2009 4:16:24 PM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: kosta50

ALL CLAIMS OF JESUS DERIVE FROM HEARSAY ACCOUNTS
No one has the slightest physical evidence to support a historical Jesus; no artifacts, dwelling, works of carpentry, or self-written manuscripts. All claims about Jesus derive from writings of other people. There occurs no contemporary Roman record that shows Pontius Pilate executing a man named Jesus. Devastating to historians, there occurs not a single contemporary writing that mentions Jesus. All documents about Jesus got written well after the life of the alleged Jesus from either: unknown authors, people who had never met an earthly Jesus, or from fraudulent, mythical or allegorical writings.


247 posted on 05/05/2009 6:32:56 PM PDT by guitarplayer1953 (Psalm 83:1-8 is on the horizon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953
ALL CLAIMS OF JESUS DERIVE FROM HEARSAY ACCOUNTS...

Like I said, you are on the right track. That's why they call it a beief. There is no proof. One must decide whether to believe or not the hearsay.

248 posted on 05/05/2009 8:59:35 PM PDT by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: kosta50
Believe in what?
249 posted on 05/05/2009 9:37:09 PM PDT by guitarplayer1953 (Psalm 83:1-8 is on the horizon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: kosta50

So what do you consider hearsay?


250 posted on 05/05/2009 9:55:38 PM PDT by guitarplayer1953 (Psalm 83:1-8 is on the horizon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953
Believe in what?

Belief that Jesus existed and is who the bible says he is.

So what do you consider hearsay?

Something lacking any objective proof, a rumor. Strange as it may seem, people do believe rumors as if they were facts.

251 posted on 05/05/2009 10:51:06 PM PDT by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: kosta50
You have already stated that the bible is not consistent and it was put together by man so why should I believe in it?
252 posted on 05/06/2009 10:45:21 PM PDT by guitarplayer1953 (Psalm 83:1-8 is on the horizon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953
You have already stated that the bible is not consistent and it was put together by man so why should I believe in it?

First, I would never say the bible was put together by "a man" meaning one single individual. Men of the Church, the hierarchs, yes. They picked and chose which books are "inspired" out of hundreds circulating the Middle East for three centuries after Christ.

Second, you still haven't answered my question.

253 posted on 05/07/2009 7:32:02 AM PDT by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953

***You have already stated that the bible is not consistent and it was put together by man so why should I believe in it?***

That is a good question and one that has to be answered by you the individual.

For example of its inconsistency, let us examine the day of Resurrection. Who went to the tomb and what did they see according to the Gospels?


254 posted on 05/07/2009 5:46:14 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-254 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson