This is just what I was getting at...first your team denies that Petros/Petra exist (”it was not in Aramaic”), then when you finally do admit it, you bring up spurious concepts which have nothing to do with the argument.
Been fun. Next time, same channel.
I am just trying to figure out what is your argument. Of course petros and petra are two different words, one is masculine proper noun, the other feminine.
Your post #90 is the first time that phrase appears in this thread. Who are you quoting?
***you bring up spurious concepts which have nothing to do with the argument.***
Sir Dutchboy, I must congratulate you. I have never seen a thread with as many posts in which a poster manages to get absolutely nothing correct.
A triumph.