To: Domandred
Palin-Bachmann 2012.
We are suffering Obama because McCain. Huckabee also sucked and sadly Fred was too slow to get started. Mitt would have been better than McCain.
12 posted on
03/30/2009 2:16:19 PM PDT by
Frantzie
(Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC & Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
To: Frantzie
I’d like Palin-DeMint. I think a Conservative male Senator from the South is a perfect match for a Conservative woman Governor from the North.
16 posted on
03/30/2009 2:22:09 PM PDT by
SolidWood
(Palin: "We do not want to becomes slaves of Washington.")
To: Frantzie
Frankly, a dug-up Nixon would have been better than McCain.
17 posted on
03/30/2009 2:22:11 PM PDT by
Pharmboy
(Democrats lie because they must...)
To: Frantzie
I decided Fred was right when he told off that smarmy school marm in Iowa. But he was too late by then. Romney would've been far better than McCain because he would have at least punched back. All other factors being equal, I look at a Mormon candidate as an advantage because the rank and file of that group are more conservative than any other sect. Of course there are exceptions like Harry Reid, who pay more attention to the DNC bosses than the tenants of their religion.
19 posted on
03/30/2009 2:26:35 PM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: Frantzie
"We are suffering Obama because McCain. Huckabee also sucked and sadly Fred was too slow to get started. Mitt would have been better than McCain." Nah, we are suffering Obama because Bushbots could not bring themselves to tell Bush the voters thought the country was going in the wrong direction. Maybe by 2010 the GOP will find something more persuading than 'Vote for us, the other guy is worse.' A Contract with America did the job before.
20 posted on
03/30/2009 2:28:36 PM PDT by
ex-snook
( "Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson