Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr

One moment you’re declaring that we cannot ust the Bible as science; the next you’re demanding that God’s word conform to your definition of terms for science sake.

Hypocrisy is the word that comes to mind.


152 posted on 03/27/2009 3:31:43 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

No hypocrisy is promoting a standard I don’t believe applies to me. This applies in all logical and scientific endeavor.

The “demand” is a basic logical and scientific requirement.

If you say evolution contradicts kind reproducing with kind, you have to first say what kind means in evolution theory or vice/versa. Else there’s not enough common terminology to use.


159 posted on 03/27/2009 3:49:10 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson