Let me try again, since perhaps you have a hard time with English.
Where does Mr Gordon start addressing the historicity of the alleged original Hebrew version of the gospel of Matthew (hereafter AOHM)? I'm really not interested in watching one side of a grudge match between apostates.
So, try setting aside the non sequitur and address the issue. In fact, let's go back to the beginning. You admonished me:
Good Luck in your search for Truth.
after commenting about a Hebrew work by one Shem Tov. (The work appears to be an attempt by medieval Jews to revise history and erase the clear messianic claims regarding Jesus from the Gospel of Matthew. Many scholars view the text as a mediaeval translation from the Greek text of the Gospel of Matthew, as well as being the likely source of all later Hebrew versions of Matthew prior to the 20th century. Wikipedia)
I asked about the historicity of this AOHM. You responded:
If you were intellectually open to understanding, I would recommend that you view this two hour video by Nehemia Gordon
So here we are with this video, made by an unbelieving Jew who is out to prove other unbelieving Jews are wrong about something. He's interpreting the Christian NT according to his own unbelieving views, and I have yet to discover any historically verifiable claim regarding the AOHM.
Good Luck in your search for Truth.
I think with this level of cooperation I need more than good luck.
I can not help you if you are intellectually lazy.
I will not help someone who so rabidly anti-semitic.shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach AdonaiMazol Tov.
Enjoy your life.