To: enat; raynearhood; topcat54; HarleyD; wmfights; Blogger
...he says new calvinism needs to abandon amillennial eschatology since all prophecy has been fulfilled. He's right that new calvinism needs to abandon amillennial eschatology but for the wrong reason. It's that prophecy has not been fulfilled.
90 posted on
03/23/2009 7:11:35 PM PDT by
wmfights
(If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
To: wmfights; raynearhood; topcat54; HarleyD; Blogger
“He’s right that new calvinism needs to abandon amillennial eschatology but for the wrong reason. It’s that prophecy has not been fulfilled”
Yeah, I know that and you know that but DeMar thinks there is nothing left to happen. I guess his eschatology or what’s left of it is like the old Peggy Lee torch song;
“Is that all there is, is that all there is
If that’s all there is my friends, then let’s keep dancing
Let’s break out the booze and have a ball
If that’s all there is”
DeMar is a promoter like Lindsey and LeHaye. They have to be controversial in order to hawk their wares.
91 posted on
03/23/2009 7:22:16 PM PDT by
enat
To: wmfights; enat; topcat54; HarleyD; Blogger; Lee N. Field
He's right that new calvinism needs to abandon amillennial eschatology but for the wrong reason. It's that prophecy has not been fulfilled.
Methinks you don't know amillennialism. We amillennialists don't believe all prophecy has been fulfilled. (neither do most preterists for that matter)
129 posted on
03/23/2009 9:33:09 PM PDT by
raynearhood
("I consider looseness with words no less a defect than looseness of the bowels" - John Calvin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson