[reaganaut]

I gave you several names not just Lee. Lee was a scapegoat. Utah was not a state then, it was a theocracy. Incitement still makes the LDS church culpable.

Of course the LDS suspect anything us “antis” say, I know I didn’t trust the “antis” when I was LDS. But I learned differently.

No one can be argued into Christ’s kingdom. Christ does the convincing. Take or leave my proofs, I really do not care. The fact of the matter remains that the LDS church consistently lies and makes excuses and leads many to damnation.

[Stourme]

I gave you several names not just Lee. Lee was a scapegoat. Utah was not a state then, it was a theocracy. Incitement still makes the LDS church culpable.

You just don't get it. And it totally baffles me as to why.

Whether or not Lee was a scapegoat or not is completely irrelevant. Completely irrelevant. It does explain a lot though.

You posted Lee's name as a victim of some Mormon conspiracy to kill people that disagree with them. That's the topic of our discussion.

I proved you wrong. Lee was convicted by an anti-Mormon prosecutor for murder. Not by Mormons because Lee disagreed with them.

Take or leave my proofs, I really do not care.

Obviously you don't care. That's part of the problem. You have yet to actually provide a "proof" ....ever.