Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bigotry against Mormons apparently acceptable in Utah LDS (OPEN)
Salt Lake Tribune ^ | March 20, 2009

Posted on 03/21/2009 8:22:38 AM PDT by greyfoxx39

Here is the response of a Utahn commenting on a Salt Lake Tribune online blog concerning HBO's attempt in its series "Big Love" to increase its revenues by publicly insulting the religious sensitivity of a minority religion: "Anything that gets the LDS "church's magical Mormon underwear in a twist is all right with me!!"

I write for a regional newspaper in Iowa. During the last election campaign, I suggested that Mitt Romney lost the Iowa caucus to Mike Huckabee primarily due to anti-Mormon bigotry. A reader argued that my opinion had no credence because I was a lay leader in the LDS Church.

The writer was either suggesting that I knew exactly what I was talking about and was therefore credible, or that I shouldn't be believed because I was a Mormon, which implies that the writer was a bigot.

-SNIP-

It is obvious to an outsider that Utah, or at least Salt Lake City, has within itself a deeply held culture of bigotry. A bigotry so ingrained in the cultural norm that the readers posting comments to the newspaper's blogs, apparently believing they are freethinking and ironic, are saying things online that would never be allowed into print if written about other groups.

(Excerpt) Read more at sltrib.com ...


TOPICS: General Discusssion; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: lds; mormon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 441-451 next last
To: Religion Moderator; greyfoxx39
This is a case of one poster accusing another poster of intending to deceive by selective use of ellipses rather than quoting the source fully.

A year ago - almost to the day - I was accused of being personally responsible for provoking war, and impeding a "global discussion between Protestants and Catholics", all because I used ellipses. Seriously.

141 posted on 03/23/2009 4:07:22 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ( "Every country has the government it deserves" - Joseph Marie de Maistre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
A year ago - almost to the day - I was accused of being personally responsible for provoking war, and impeding a "global discussion between Protestants and Catholics", all because I used ellipses. Seriously.

Seriesly...did you get zotted by the Viking Kitties for it?

142 posted on 03/23/2009 4:11:14 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Recession-Your neighbor loses his job, Depression-you lost your job, Recovery-Obama loses HIS job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]


143 posted on 03/23/2009 4:16:15 PM PDT by Godzilla (If the first step in an argument is wrong everything that follows is wrong. ~C.S. Lewis, The Problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla
liking your new placemarker ;)

Photobucket

144 posted on 03/23/2009 6:49:15 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Recession-Your neighbor loses his job, Depression-you lost your job, Recovery-Obama loses HIS job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

Wasn’t in the mood for a submarine, ate one for lunch.


145 posted on 03/23/2009 6:59:05 PM PDT by Godzilla (If the first step in an argument is wrong everything that follows is wrong. ~C.S. Lewis, The Problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator
I am not the arbiter of truth, fact, logic, etc. If I bent to your wish to establish the fact of a matter and disallow all views to the contrary, I would also have to bend to your opponent's wish to establish the fact of a matter and disallow all views to the contrary. That is not tolerable. Posters must argue what is true and false on open threads, not by attacking the other posters personally and certainly not by starting a new thread as a personal attack. You are obviously too thin-skinned for the "open" threads on this Religion Forum. Ignore them. Post instead to the "prayer" "devotional" "caucus" and "ecumenical" threads. Leave this thread.

Wow.

Thank you.

146 posted on 03/24/2009 3:55:21 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut
Not dubious, matters of historical record. You said “NEVER” and I gave examples.
The original quote was:
Mormons don’t kill those who disagree with them....
Where then you proceeded to list examples like "Blood Atonement". Blood Atonement is a principle....not an event. And has nothing to do with someone "disagreeing" with Mormons.

The items you listed have no comparative value to the original quote. At best it's bizarro logic.

Urban legends and fairy tales never give weight to an argument.
147 posted on 03/24/2009 4:47:32 PM PDT by Stourme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Stourme

Blood Atonement is a principle that was practiced. Some of the victims were apostates, those who did not agree anymore with the LDS.

They are not urban legends or fairly tales. Unlike the Book of Mormon.

Just face up to history.


148 posted on 03/24/2009 4:52:27 PM PDT by reaganaut (ex-mormon, now Christian. "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: restornu
What Was the 1838 “Mormon War”?

Was this meant for me??
149 posted on 03/24/2009 4:53:30 PM PDT by Stourme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut
Blood Atonement is a principle that was practiced. Some of the victims were apostates, those who did not agree anymore with the LDS.

Give me the names of these apostates that you claim were executed by the LDS or admit it didn't happen.


150 posted on 03/24/2009 4:56:09 PM PDT by Stourme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

That’s a very interesting claim. Please ping with names of those who were executed by the LDS Church. If you cannot, kindly withdraw the accusation.

False accusations may well indicate a deep character flaw.


151 posted on 03/24/2009 5:00:19 PM PDT by Old Mountain man (Blessed be the Peacemaker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Stourme

Symon Andersen Matheson. for one.


152 posted on 03/24/2009 5:05:10 PM PDT by colorcountry (A faith without truth is not true faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: fproy2222
Geesh..."fred"?

What in the name of J. Smith did you say in post #123 that was REMOVED by the MOD's?

Does resty know?

ROFLOL!!

153 posted on 03/24/2009 5:07:25 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Our constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators. -Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Stourme
Yes....

I am channeling Fred Resty.............

154 posted on 03/24/2009 5:08:43 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Our constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators. -Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Old Mountain man; Stourme
Here's a list for you of Mormon blood atonement upon individuals

130 or so of them.

155 posted on 03/24/2009 5:13:27 PM PDT by colorcountry (A faith without truth is not true faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut

Ping to #155


156 posted on 03/24/2009 5:17:52 PM PDT by colorcountry (A faith without truth is not true faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry
Here's a list for you of Mormon blood atonement upon individuals


Do you just type in what ever random non-sense comes into your mind? That's an honest question btw. I'm just curious.

How in the world do you make the logical leap of connecting blood atonement with Mountain Meadows?

John Calvin and Martin Luther burning people at the stake for heresy doesn't even jive...
157 posted on 03/24/2009 6:00:41 PM PDT by Stourme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry
Symon Andersen Matheson. for one
Did you just pick a random pioneer name?

He was born 1841, died 1864, was part of the Duncan company that came west.... what's your point?
158 posted on 03/24/2009 6:16:43 PM PDT by Stourme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

This post indicates a personality that is stuck on one thing. This post also indicates a failure to follow The Lord’s admonition in His instructions: “forgive us our trespasses as WE FORGIVE THOSE WHO HAVE TRESPASSED AGAINST US.”

Perhaps this poster could explain how we have trespassed against her in an unforgivable way? Or will this generate another abuse complaint?

If I have trespassed against you, I ask your forgiveness.


159 posted on 03/24/2009 6:45:13 PM PDT by Old Mountain man (Blessed be the Peacemaker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

Thank you for the post listing the victims.


160 posted on 03/24/2009 6:59:28 PM PDT by reaganaut (ex-mormon, now Christian. "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 441-451 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson