Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

"...there was a different spirit in Brigham [Young's] journals." Young brought prejudices common in America at the time into the Mormon faith, sociologist Armand Mauss wrote. No longer were men with even a drop of African blood allowed to be ordained to the priesthood, which otherwise was available to virtually all males starting at 12. Blacks could still be members, but couldn't be leaders, serve missions or be married in one of the faith's temples.
1 posted on 03/20/2009 1:00:38 PM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Alex Murphy

I am a black woman married to a white man for the last 20 years. I am sorry, but could not join a “church” that had such racist origins.


2 posted on 03/20/2009 1:02:50 PM PDT by brwnsuga (Proud, Black, Sexy Conservative!!! I am no LEMMING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy
320 replies HERE
3 posted on 03/20/2009 1:07:44 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Recession-Your neighbor loses his job, Depression-you lost your job, Recovery-Obama loses HIS job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

“I am told that racial slurs and denigrating remarks are sometimes heard among us,” Hinckley said during the all-male priesthood session. “I remind you that no man who makes disparaging remarks concerning those of another race can consider himself a true disciple of Christ. Nor can he consider himself to be in harmony with the teachings of the Church of Christ. How can any man holding the Melchizedek Priesthood arrogantly assume that he is eligible for the priesthood whereas another who lives a righteous life but whose skin is of a different color is ineligible?”


6 posted on 03/20/2009 1:13:24 PM PDT by Old Mountain man (Blessed be the Peacemaker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

Almost every American denomination split between north and south during the 1850s. Southerners insisted on defending slavery, while many northerners wanted to denounce it.

Interestingly, one can find a great deal of support in the Bible for the institution of slavery, but none at all for racism. In the ancient world, the two had nothing at all to do with each other.


7 posted on 03/20/2009 1:14:45 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

Sadly, while Christians were at the forefront of the abolition movement, other Christians were brought along kicking and screaming.

It is a sad fact that not everyone awakens to evil right away when that evil is embedded in the culture, even when opposition to that same evil is also embedded in the very same culture. It takes time, even generations, to work all that through.

Its human nature. It takes time for some evils to be overturned, even among otherwise good and virtuous people. Christ has a way of undermining evil, but not all of it will be worked out in any one generation, not even among Christians.


20 posted on 03/20/2009 1:50:57 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy; Old Mountain man

Here is a link to excerpts from the Encyclopedia on Religion in the South. It really sheds light on the institutional racism in Southern churches.

http://books.google.com/books?id=yx2EarrpKGUC&printsec=frontcover&dq=encyclopedia+religion+south#PPA713,M1

Have you removed the beam?


21 posted on 03/20/2009 1:52:39 PM PDT by ComeUpHigher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

Racist as compared to what? The Mormon church from its founding opposed slavery. You can’t really say that about most of the other Christian denominations and other religions in the New World.


23 posted on 03/20/2009 2:06:06 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

Sometime before the ‘revelation’ came to chief ‘Prophet’ Spencer Kimball in June 1978, General Authority, Bruce R McConkie had said:

“The Blacks are denied the Priesthood; under no circumstances can they hold this delegation of authority from the Almighty.

The Negroes are not equal with other races where the receipt of certain blessings are concerned, particularly the priesthood and the temple blessings that flow there from, but this inequality is not of man’s origin, it is the Lord’s doings.” (Mormon Doctrine, pp. 526-527).


33 posted on 03/20/2009 4:19:09 PM PDT by Godzilla (If the first step in an argument is wrong everything that follows is wrong. ~C.S. Lewis, The Problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

The 1978 revelation doesn’t say blacks are no longer of the lineage of Cain, nor does it say that they no longer did these things in preexistence. It does not say they are not cursed with black skin.


34 posted on 03/20/2009 4:30:48 PM PDT by Godzilla (If the first step in an argument is wrong everything that follows is wrong. ~C.S. Lewis, The Problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson