And one more time..., in regards to this...
You said — Exactly, if you believe in pretrib rapture. What about prewrath or midtrib rapture?
—
I don’t know how far post #237 goes to answering that. Perhaps not all the way.
I said in there, “Should they believe in it” (i.e, the doctrine of imminence). Once you find out “if” they should believe in it (and I presume that yes, they should; either it’s a true doctrine or not, and I think it’s true...) — then — you go and see how well does the doctrine of imminence fit in with mid-trib and pre-wrath positions. In other words, does the true teaching of the doctrine of imminence allow one to maintain (at the same time) their position of mid-trib and/or pre-wrath.
You have to say either (1) yes it does allow me to maintain both, or (2) no it does not allow me to maintain both.
I think, in regards to the pre-trib position that I can maintain both (1) the doctrine of imminence, and also (2) the pre-trib position.
That’s where the argument is at, I think...
So its OK to have arguments between pretrib, prewrath, and midtrib in the caucus?
Another area to argue is the slippery slope of church vs Israel between the three. Pretrib understands the Israel connection.