Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: steve86

“then it’s hard to justify targetting this small group of traditionalists, even though they have some very wrong-headed ideas about the extent of Holocaust.

How did Williamson become “they”? “

If it was Williamson alone among this group then I stand corrected.


18 posted on 03/11/2009 2:00:58 PM PDT by Texan Tory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Texan Tory; steve86

Williamson was the only one to publicly express views that can be briefly characterized as denial of the Holocaust of the Jews in WWII; he now regretted the publicity and promised to reconsider his views in light of all the evidence.

However, SSPX as a whole is sometimes described by its critics as vaguely anti-Semitic. Mind you, however, that what SSPX really was objecting to was ecumenism crossing over to indifferentism, when the only orthodox form of ecumenism the Catholic Church should embrace is call to conversion, of non-Catholic Christians to Catholicism and of Jews and other non-Christians, to Christ. There were articles appearing in SSPX publications that highlighted the differences between Catholic Christianity and Judaism that might offend non-Catholics. It looks like SSPX distanced itself from some of these writings lately.


20 posted on 03/11/2009 3:24:57 PM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson