I beg to differ
Well, no need to beg, this a consevative forum and you are perfectly free to express an opinion :o)
Still, I don't see why you differ. I reread the article and the only reference I see to anything
not Western Evangelical is this:
•Evangelicalism needs a "rescue mission" from the world Christian community. It is time for missionaries to come to America from Asia and Africa.
I disagree with that 'solution,' but the point I'm making is that the only reference he makes to non-Western Christians is by referencing a 'need' for missionaries to the West to revitalize Christianity in the wake of a Western Evangelical collapse.
The failing Evangelical movement he was referencing is Western Evangelicalism.
You've defended my original statement to you better than myself. This is a poorly written, overly generalized, pontificating, personal opinion parading itself as "deep thinking" from a rag that is owned by a cult. Let me ask again, why should I consider anything to be legitimate from this source? Just because he writes a blog?