Replies

I think so long as transcending is in there, I’d agree with you.

The main point being that there are categories of knowledge and tools for each category. If we wish to know the circumference of the earth, we don’t consult faith, we measure using the tools of science.

These tools used for the limited sphere of science cannot be used to completely know what can be known using philosophy.

And there are areas of knowledge which cannot be known using the tools of philosophy and science alone; we need religious search if we are to continue seeking knowledge beyond the capacity of science and philosophy alone.

And when we do so, we have to be mindful of our method: gross errors occur when we deduce science from theology or infer theology from science.

Now, in practice this sharp division of spheres becomes less clear. Maybe this is where infusion comes in. Science, for example, assumes certain absolutes in order to do its work. And a monk in contemplative prayer is fully alive to sense data.

But all of the spheres of knowledge share the common goal of the search for truth. Properly used, the tools do not compete, but complement.

Here’s how Pope John Paul II put it:

“There is thus no reason for competition of any kind between reason and faith: each contains the other, and each has its own scope for action.”

This is from his “Faith and Reason,” which in my opinion is a masterpiece on the subject.

http://www.vatican.va/edocs/ENG0216/_INDEX.HTM