Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex

I’ve already refuted your many fallacies on this subject. If you want to live like Nature Boy, naked in the jungle because you reject technological triumphs over the inconveniences of physiology, then why are your still on the Internet?


186 posted on 02/19/2009 11:46:09 AM PST by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: steve-b
To your recent posts.

If you want to live like Nature Boy

I don't. I am very happy with the advances of science, use it and recommend other to use it. Contraception just happens not to be among these advances.

a rational brain, through which undesired aspects of nature may be overcome

Indeed; see above.

The "demographic crisis" is as phony

Birth rates way below replacement are reality, unlike the other invented scares.

so you're a Moral Relativist, then [indicating that banning contraception might be impractical].

No, that is not what moral relativism is. A moral relativist is one who says that contraception is either a moral wrong or a moral good depending on who is using it.

193 posted on 02/19/2009 12:59:11 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson