Nonsense. A law against assault, for example, is not "coercion" -- self-defense is not coercive, but rather the exercise of a natural right, and making it a matter of law is simply delegation to the state as one's agent for exercising that right.
Still, a murderer is coerced — rightly — from doing more murdering. The questin is not whether a law coerces but does the coercion improve things for the common good, - as I said in the post you are responding to.