that Roe v Wade interview is not stellar - it is hem and haw and try not to say what you believe for fear of losing one vote someplace.
“that Roe v Wade interview is not stellar - it is hem and haw and try not to say what you believe for fear of losing one vote someplace.”
That's a pretty good theory of what happened there.
That doesn't encourage me - that suggests that this is a guy who is willing to fudge supposedly deeply-held principles for the sake of a few extra votes. Not the sort of thing you want in your party leader.
That being said, if he makes clear that Roe must go, I'll support him.
But not otherwise.
sitetest