[js1138]

no it isn’t- He has stated that he’s not sure- whether it’s from outer space, or from nature or from soemwhere else undertmined. He can beleive anyhtign he likes, but reasonability does not indicate complete CSI can be transfered to genetic information- comunicaiton does NOT add infromaiton to cells

Well let's see what Dembski actiually says, as opposed to what you claim he says:

In evolutionary search, a large number offspring is often generated, and the more fit offspring are selected for the next generation. When some offspring are correctly announced as more fit than others, external knowledge is being applied to the search giving rise to active information. As with the child’s game of finding a hidden object, we are being told with respect to the solution whether we are getting ”colder” or ”warmer” to the target.

[tpanther]

As with the child’s game of finding a hidden object, we are being told with respect to the solution whether we are getting ”colder” or ”warmer” to the target.

And now think of all those times we've been lectured from the evo crowd that creationists don't talk about science in scientific terms...:)

[CottShop]

Where’s you link JS- You are takign snippets out of his paper on hte issue- He said just hwat I said he said- The snippet you posted is in direct contrdiction to what he previously expressed- He’s not consistent with his claims- He goes fro mdescribing CSI, makign hte statement that he isn’t sure where it comes from, then does a 180 and starts describing selection as though it somehow equates with CSI and is an example of CSI transference when it is nothign but an example of general information- NOT cellular infusion