Replies

And “Darwinists” are defined as anyone wagglebee disagrees with?

Nonsense.

Are you saying that Charles Galton, Leonard Darwin, et al WERE NOT Darwinists?

I assume you figure if you continue to ignore my question about your anti-FReeper site you can pretend FReepers don't know about it. Oh well, I was delighted to participate in getting several of your Darwinist ilk zotted, I think my favorite was the pro-Hitler troll who went crying to your forum and called me the "Grand Inquisitor" of FR.

51 posted on 01/25/2009 5:10:12 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)

I assume you figure if you continue to ignore my question about your anti-FReeper site you can pretend FReepers don't know about it.

If you are referring to DarwinCentral.org, at least you could give the url so folks can check it out for themselves. I think they'll find that the site is far more than an "anti-FReeper" site.

A lot of the pro-science posters who were banned here ended up starting their own site. Why do you have a problem with that? Or do you expect that folks who are banned from here are banned from the internet forever?

53 posted on 01/25/2009 5:27:31 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)