Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Ronaldus Magnus
Do you deny that the SSPX is in schism? Pope Benedict(back to the time he was a cardinal) and Cardinal Castrillón Hoyos have repeatedly said the SSPX isn't in schism. I'm not willing to further than the Pope. Why are you? Being in schism has very specific meaning, it's not a term that should be thrown around lightly. The local parish in my town says that baptism is not necessary, and will only perform it in some cases, to "appease the grandparents." Should I consider them schismatic? Of course not.
22 posted on 01/13/2009 5:04:26 PM PST by nickcarraway (Are the Good Times Really Over?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway
Pope Benedict(back to the time he was a cardinal) and Cardinal Castrillón Hoyos have repeatedly said the SSPX isn't in schism.

Baloney. I really find this deceit to be offensive. Please see the 1988 Pope John Paul II quote and link in my post #23. Anyone who reads that and is still in doubt about the schismatic state of the SSPX is lying to themselves. Again, I'm not interested in wasting time debating self-deluded liars.

25 posted on 01/13/2009 5:18:32 PM PST by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson