Try reading what I WROTE instead of what you imagine.
As to intentions, one can not divorce one's intentions from the direct effect of a thing.
The abortionist cannot say that he doesn't intend the death of the unborn child, only that he intends to terminate a pregnancy, since he is terminating the pregnancy by way of killing the unborn child. Killing the unborn child is the direct effect, the means to terminating the pregnancy.
Thus, one cannot write a lying book offering lies why pro-life Catholics can vote for the most extreme pro-abortion politician ever to run for president and claim that one doesn't intend the direct effects that come therefrom, that is, deception to elect the pro-abort anti-Christ. The arguments put forth in his book were repudiated and called false by a number of senior American bishops, including Archbishop Chaput of Denver, where the Party of Satan Convention was held. In spite of being directly repudiated, and told that his teachings were false, the creature Kmiec persisted in them, even lying about Archbishop Chaput’s statements on the topic.
Furthermore, the lies that the minion of Satan Kmiec told were directly aimed at deceiving Catholics specifically about the issue of abortion and the right to life.
Thus, it was the creature Kmiec’s specific intention to perform actions that specifically deceived people into voting for an all-abortion-all-the-time anti-Christ. His specific intention was to assist in electing someone who will cause hundreds of thousands of additional abortions.
Having read Mein Kampf, no German could vote for Hitler and claim he meant no harm to the Jews. Having knowledge of the facts of the anti-Christ Obama's record, no one can claim he means no harm to unborn children. Making formal, emphatic apologias for the anti-Christ Obama makes one culpable for the anti-Christ Obama's crimes.
sitetest
May the cup of mercy you carry not be measured on you.