To: Matchett-PI
" notes that the grammar of the verse is done in a way that is "purposeful and by design so as to stress the unitary whole, the totality, and the completeness" of the 70 week block. The weeks "cannot be split apart in such a way as to separate the final 'one week' " as dispensationalists require. [....]
Ohhh. That had to hurt. :-).
152 posted on
01/12/2009 11:16:27 AM PST by
Lee N. Field
(Dispensational exegesis not supported by an a-, post- or historic pre-mil scholar will be ignored.)
To: Lee N. Field; Matchett-PI
Ohhh. That had to hurt. :-). No one ever accused them of sound exegesis.
159 posted on
01/12/2009 2:00:51 PM PST by
topcat54
("Friends don't let friends become dispensationalists.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson