Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/31/2008 9:57:42 AM PST by mlizzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mlizzy
...her fiance, who dropped out of high school and whose Myspace recently read, "I'm a ... redneck" and "I don't want kids," ...

I thought that was a hacker...?

2 posted on 12/31/2008 10:03:25 AM PST by randog (Hope is a bad business plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy
"... But unlike the Jimmy Stewart character, Sarah did not have the last say, for when she did have the chance to hammer Obama or Biden on abortion or other life issues, she rarely did, and by making the economy—not morality—the main issue, the Democrats of Death won handily."

I suspect that McVain's "handlers" were responsible for that, not Palin.

4 posted on 12/31/2008 10:09:03 AM PST by RightWingConspirator (Swiftboating: Revealing inconvenient truths about Democrat candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

When you cut through all the verbiage, the bedrock point of this piece is Sarah’s pro-life position is more squishy now that she’s no longer a Roman Catholic, which she was born into, but a church-hopping Protestant...

And THAT more than anything else is why she didn’t stress it as much as the writer wished she had stressed it during the campaign.

Let me say, if the writer just wanted her to stress it more just because of it’s importance to him and certain others, that’s one thing.

But if he wanted her to stress it more, thinking it would’ve helped the McCain-Palin ticket win, that’s very different.

Of course it wouldn’t have, because hammering away at that particular issue wouldn’t have helped people go vote for them who already knew and didn’t turn out.

And that’s what we had.

The Dems held a turnout election and the Republicans held an election.

Studies show a few mil Conservative voters didn’t vote.

There’s no way Sarah harping on pro-life more would have stirred ‘em when they were bound to have known already about the Supreme Court picks at stake and Obama and Dems devotion to pro-death.

You don’t need harping. You just need to decide, do I vote at all when I’m unhappy with the choice of McCain, given what’s at stake if the other guy wins.

Which is what they decided.


6 posted on 12/31/2008 10:25:24 AM PST by txrangerette (Just say "no" to the Obama Cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

Sarah has demonstrated her pro-life stance simply by living it. While she has spoken about the subject, I think that her actions speak more loudly than any words could.


9 posted on 12/31/2008 10:29:46 AM PST by chickpundit (Palin '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

People are not going to see the truth about abortion until we find a truly charismatic and powerful rhetorician to enchant them with a call to righteousness.


14 posted on 12/31/2008 10:44:31 AM PST by Soothesayer (The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy
including the Assemblies of God and, more recently, a non-denom bible church. Since these churches do not have a definite stance on the issue

Bull!

The Assemblies of God has a very definitive stance on abortion.

Abortion. The Assemblies of God views the practice of abortion as an evil that has been inflicted upon millions of innocent babies and that will threaten millions more in the years to come. Abortion is a morally unacceptable alternative for birth control, population control, sex selection, and elimination of the physically and mentally handicapped. Certain parts of the world are already experiencing serious population imbalances as a result of the systematic abortion of female babies. The advocacy and practice of so-called partial birth abortion of babies is particularly heinous.

From:

http://ag.org/top/Beliefs/Position_Papers/pp_downloads/pp_4196_sanctity_human_life.pdf

19 posted on 12/31/2008 11:02:23 AM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

last week we celebrated the birth of a child born to an unwed young woman.

not a comparable birth, I know, but Mary was betrothed, not married, by God’s choice!


37 posted on 12/31/2008 2:51:37 PM PST by elpadre (nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

A priest friend from Alaska and I were visiting and he happened to mention that the message Governor Palin sent at the dedication of a monument to the unborn blew all others out of the water, including the bishop’s. He wondered if it had to do with her being a pregnant mother, at the time. He said it was very beautiful.


39 posted on 12/31/2008 3:02:27 PM PST by mockingbyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlizzy

It’s unfair to criticize Palin for “leaving”the Catholic church when her family “left” the church when she was in gradeschool...

Knowing the church problems in northern Idaho, (where the Pius X church is strong) maybe they left because they couldn’t find Jesus in the Catholic church.

One of the “side effects” of Vatican II is that it pushed a lot of Christians out of the Catholic churches in liberal dioceses and parishes.

If I hadn’t been aware of the catholic (universal) church, I too would have left...but when you have lived overseas, and know history, you realize the “fads” come and go, but the power of the spirit in the church remains...


45 posted on 12/31/2008 9:57:37 PM PST by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson