Replies

From your rant, my assumption is apparently dead on target.

Here's your clue: if I was ranting, you would know it. Your dismissal of my comments reveals your own closed mind. You have proclaimed that sleaze and smut are 'unavoidable' and you don't want to hear anything that conflicts with that view.

You are clearly beyond the ability to grasp the larger point, so wrapped up in your anybody/anytime/anywhere access to base material that has been proven detrimental for mind, body and soul.

Well why don't you slam a few neurons together and explain in detail just what your 'larger point' is supposed to be then?

You must not have a very pragmatic view of reality if you think parents can filter the smut that is in the oxygen we breathe nowadays. “LAZY” you say. You’ve got some ungodly nerve.

Yes I say LAZY because if you (or anyone) won't even make the effort, and choose instead to take refuge in the lame excuse of "well, it's everywhere and we can't do anything about it", that is the height of laziness, and it is amoral because you are surrendering without even trying to resist that which seeks to corrupt the human soul.

It is unavoidable.

So your solution is to just give up? Yep, that's lazy. And cowardly.

Ask yourself how all this pornographic taint has helped society? Who has it benefitted except horney, weak types who want their ‘drug’ and trade away anything of substance, respect and wisdom to get it?

It hasn't. It seems for some reason that you've got the idea that I am somehow 'pro' porno, when nothing could be further from the truth. I read some of your comments which sound like you're condemning the smut infested society we live in, and then you just wilt with a sigh, saying "it's unavoidable, can't do anything about it", what side of this issue are you on anyway?

Porn addicts, the most revolting of the species, reverse their ability to develop meaningful human relationships. It’s their shallow, crack cocaine.

You're preaching to the choir.

It’s broken up relationships, ruined kids, increased teen misery....early sex/stds, pregnancy, abortion, suicide—it’s increased sex crimes ( remember how even Ted Bundy —as a parting comment said “you really ought to do something about the pornography, it’s dangerous” ) and it has generally merchandised humans as disposable ‘outlet’ units.

I'm agreeing with you 100 percent, in case you still don't "get it".

Maybe you can get a clue dude.

Say that in the mirror, I think we're on the same page 'dude', except that unlike you, I'm not willing to just surrender and resign myself to the prospect of kids being subjected to that 'unavoidable' sleaze you don't sound like you have the stomach for to fight.

So which is it?

Which is it?

Can you not understand what you propose is completely unrealistic?

Parents are supposed to cherry-pick an increasingly narrow scope of life to try and raise their kids sans the perverse in their face?

How do you recommend these “lazy” parents negotiate this increasingly cluttered minefield?

And whatever happened to the rights of families to enjoy a reasonable, no sexual explicitness, no sleaze along the mainstream of life?

This is exactly what second hand smoke rights protection is about.

Do want you damn well please—but do it somewhere where it does not pollute my world, my lungs, my health and my brain.

I’m actually in favor of red light districts. That includes red light cyber districts like dot.porn extensions—with firm restrictions for use and trafficking of content.

That means OFF THE MAINSTREAM.