Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Truth Defender

The modern conceit of treating the word “understanding” as a subjective evaluation is just that...a modern conceit.

One either understands, or one does not.

I think you should re-read what I wrote about ones own facts. I wrote the opposite of what you seem to think I wrote.


29 posted on 12/01/2008 2:07:41 PM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger
The modern conceit of treating the word “understanding” as a subjective evaluation is just that...a modern conceit.

Understanding is subjective. No getting around that. LOL

One either understands, or one does not.

This is the first time you have used the term "understands". Your original says: "One has a right to their own opinion; one has no right to their own facts.

So, how can you say: "I think you should re-read what I wrote about ones own facts. I wrote the opposite of what you seem to think I wrote."? Then perhaps you should re-phrase it, don't you think?

31 posted on 12/01/2008 2:33:18 PM PST by Truth Defender (Christ did NOT come to save an immortal sinner, but to give a mortal sinner the offer of immortality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson