To: topcat54; xzins; enat
If you were a newbie I would take the time to explain the difference...I suppose someone could argue that Jesus came back in 1988 in the same manner he came back in 70 AD. But then that would be disingenuous.
The fact of the matter is that nobody will have to wonder when Jesus returned when he returns. EVERY EYE SHALL SEE HIM!
That didn't happen in 70 AD and it didn't happen in 1988.
76 posted on
12/01/2008 8:08:30 PM PST by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: P-Marlowe; xzins; Lee N. Field
That didn't happen in 70 AD and it didn't happen in 1988. Since I'm a nice guy I will take a brief moment to mention that neither I nor any of my friends take the events of AD70 as the Second Coming. I have never said anything to the contrary. Of course you knew that so I should not have to repeat myself.
Chuck Smith, on the other hand, did believe the actual Second Coming was to occur in 1988. Perhaps you did too. Many dispies did.
We now return to our regular programming.
78 posted on
12/01/2008 8:18:47 PM PST by
topcat54
("Friends don't let friends become dispensationalists.")
To: P-Marlowe; topcat54; xzins; enat
The funny part is that using preterist eschatological assumptions, you can't disprove the Jehovah's Witness assertion that Jesus came back in 1914 (correct me if I've misremembered the date).
Shalom!
103 posted on
12/02/2008 7:19:32 AM PST by
Buggman
(HebrewRoot.com - Baruch haBa b'Shem ADONAI!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson