American Anti-Catholicism [Ecumenical]

Rev. Dwight Longenecker

[NYer]

 

Last week, Greenville, South Carolina -- the buckle of the Bible Belt -- made national headlines for the second time in two weeks. The first story involved Rev. Jay Scott Newman and his comments in his parish bulletin about Catholics who voted for Obama. The second was the announcement that the fundamentalist Bob Jones University had issued a public apology for its racist past.

 

I happen to be connected to both stories: I'm on the staff of Father Newman's parish, and I'm a graduate of Bob Jones University. How I managed to exit the school in 1978 and return to Greenville nearly 30 years later to be ordained as a Catholic priest is a story in itself, but the coincidence of the two news items in two weeks highlighted the question of anti-Catholicism in our country: Father Newman's statement elicited vitriolic anti-Church statements in some cases, and Bob Jones University is infamous not only for its past racism but its strong anti-Catholicism.

 

I was a student at Bob Jones University in the mid 1970s when the first black student was admitted. I was there in 1977 when Pope Paul VI died, and I heard Dr. Bob Jones Jr. speak his now famous words: "Pope Paul VI, archpriest of Satan, a deceiver and an anti-Christ, has, like Judas, gone to his own place." I remember students who were training to be Baptist preachers returning to campus bragging that they had visited a local Catholic church and spit in the font, then prayed for deliverance for all the devil worshippers who went there every Sunday. Every year we had the chance to hear Ian Paisley, the fiery Northern Irish Presbyterian preacher, deliver blistering attacks on Catholics during his annual American preaching tour.

 

This was the stuff of old-fashioned Protestant anti-Catholicism, rooted in centuries of misinformation, black propaganda, and sincere misunderstanding. This was the anti-Catholicism in which the pope was the anti-Christ riding on the back of that great whore of Babylon, the Catholic Church. It fed on Lorraine Boettner's Roman Catholicism, that classic collection of calumnies, lies, and half-truths. As fundamentalist youths, we read the sensational Jack Chick tracts. These riveting comic books portrayed the Catholic Church as a pagan, cookie-worshipping cult, complete with crazed priests, murderous popes, and the bodies of illegitimate babies buried in tunnels under convents. It was juicy stuff -- completely paranoid and ridiculous, but juicy nonetheless.

 

 

In this ecumenical age, such traditional Protestant bigotry is dying out. More and more, Evangelical Christians are coming to realize that the "old old story" of God's love for a dying world and the saving work of Christ on the cross is now most fully and vigorously told by the modern Catholic Church, as so many of their own churches are buying into the secular, morally indifferent agenda of the world around them. Marcus Grodi's Coming Home Network reports an increasing number of Evangelical pastors coming into the Catholic Church; it might not be long before Bob Jones University itself issues a statement apologizing for its anti-Catholicism.

 

Does this mean that anti-Catholicism is dead? I fear not. While the old-fashioned Protestant variety is dying out, a new and equally virulent form is rising up, evident in three different manifestations.

 

The first is from people who actually call themselves Catholics. The dissenting Catholics in our church have, for the most part, worn a friendly face. They couch their disobedience in polite terminology. They "respectfully disagree with the Holy Father," or "they are listening carefully to the teaching of the Church, but they are also listening carefully to their own consciences." This deceitful dissent will soon die out: As the radical Catholics see their own agendas withering for lack of interest, and as they observe the increasing youth and influence of the faithful Catholics, their true colors will be revealed. If they have not done so already, those dissenting Catholics will remove themselves from the Church. Their failure will focus in anger, their frustration will surface as rage, and they will move from being dissenting Catholics to outspoken critics of the Church.

 

The second category of the new anti-Catholicism will involve a fresh kind of Protestant revolt. The new Protestant anti-Catholicism will not be from backwoods preachers, with their colorful imagery of whores and dragons, but from the urbane practitioners of suburban, liberal Protestantism. The liberal Protestants who endorse women's ordination, homosexual "marriage," and the whole liberal agenda will become increasingly impatient with Catholicism. Already they sneer at a religion that "demands blind obedience to a medieval monarch." Their frustration at what they perceive to be the Catholic Church's stance on contraception, abortion, women's rights, and homosexuality will lead them to call for Catholicism to be restrained because it is divisive and fosters hate and intolerance, opposing the "New World Order."

 

In his 2003 book The New Anti-Catholicism, Philip Jenkins describes the third purveyor of the new anti-Catholicism: the secular hedonistic population in the United States. Jenkins recounts a few incidents to illustrate the point: In New York in 1989, a gay activist group demonstrated in St. Patrick's Cathedral. They interrupted Mass, forcing the archbishop to abandon his sermon, and threw condoms around the church and desecrated the Host. In 2000, twenty ski-masked members of a "feminist autonomous collective" interrupted Mass in Montreal. They spray-painted slogans on the walls of the church and altar, tried to overturn the tabernacle, stuck used sanitary napkins on pictures and walls, threw condoms around the sanctuary, and chanted pro-abortion slogans.

 

These are a few of the most extreme examples, but Jenkins shows how the anti-Catholic attitude that fuels these extreme protests is woven, both subtly and blatantly, throughout the American media and educational culture. Jenkins isn't a Catholic, so his work is all the more powerful for its objective position.

 

In Tortured for Christ, his account of imprisonment under the Communist regime in Romania, Protestant pastor Richard Wurmbrandt observed that, in prison, there were no divisions between Catholics and Protestants -- all were simply Christian brothers. As our society shifts and introduces new forms of anti-Catholicism, Catholics should be prepared to forge new alliances. We may find that our best friends used to be our worst enemies.

 

Conservative Evangelicals share many of the same values that we as Catholics have always proclaimed. We need to be open-minded, build bridges with those who distrust us, and work together in the fight for a culture of life. Who knows -- Bob Jones University might yet introduce a "Fellowship of Bob Jones Catholics," and I could be their chaplain.

 

[NYer]

---

Rev. Dwight Longenecker writes from Greenville, South Carolina where he is Chaplain to St Joseph's Catholic School. Read his website and daily blog at www.dwightlongenecker.com.

[NYer]

Ping!

[Alex Murphy]

traditional Protestant bigotry

So much for ecumenicism.

[SonlitKnight]

what is the third category?

[SonlitKnight]

nm

[Lorianne]

Not news. You have people right here on FR in 2008 who claim to know who is a ‘real Christian’ and who is not.

This is why, in my opinion, political conservatism is lost. Too much vitriolic infighting bewteen Christians and an exclusionary bent towards non-Christians.

Divided we fall.

[ken21]

agree.

my extended family of fundamentalists and evangelicals fought for decades over who was a “real christian”.

it got radical.

and it destroyed the extended family.

2/3 of us kids became not religious.

[elcid1970]

Recently I have been attending Mass at St. Martin de Porres Church in Columbia, SC. I had been baptized there in 1948 when it was a Dominican mission to one of few black Catholic congregations in the state. They recently dedicated a fine new church building.

Last Sunday after the Postcommunion, the celebrant asked us to be seated (an annoyance in many parishes to insure a captive audience for announcements); he went on to assure the congregation that a Father Newman (whom I did not know of at the time) had been `disciplined’ for his `un-inclusive statements’ and that those who voted for the pro-choice candidate (name was not mentioned) could rest easy with a clear conscience.

Having stumbled upon this thread, I am at once both enlightened and appalled. Of course, add me to the list of supporters of Father Newman.

[bitterohiogunclinger]

Great article, and I've experienced first hand the narrow mindedness of those that believe those “tracts”. However, it still doesn't explain how anyone that identifies themselves as “Catholic” in any category could vote for Obama.

[GonzoII]

“So much for ecumenicism.”

---

You really can’t be that sensitive?!

[MiddleEarth]

Very interesting read. Thanks!

[Guyin4Os]

One can disagree with catholicism without being “anti-catholic.” And it isn’t necessarily bigoted to do so.

[Mad Dawg]

True enough.

[IrishCatholic]

“traditional Protestant bigotry
So much for ecumenicism.”

What? You haven't seen it right here on FR?

Also, your snarky comment doesn't mean the two aren't accurate. There is an effort to reach out on common ground and a realization of long standing bigotry. The article in no way paints the bigotry as all protestants, to imply it does isn't fair. The article also discusses the rot in the Catholic Church among its own members.
Taking in the whole article and context makes me wonder why you bothered posting at all, unless you don't think there is a long history of anti-Catholicism in America.

[IrishCatholic]

Nor does the article state it does. To imply it does isn’t fair or accurate.

[Truth Defender]

One can disagree with catholicism without being “anti-catholic.” And it isn’t necessarily bigoted to do so.

Exactly! And that is why many who disagree with Catholics on some points encourage dialogue with them, and vice-versa. Strange that this produces antagonism among people when they should be rejoicing that they can learn much from each other concerning differing viewpoints. After all, one can learn much from discussion with those who disagree with you.

[Tax-chick]

In Tortured for Christ, his account of imprisonment under the Communist regime in Romania, Protestant pastor Richard Wurmbrandt observed that, in prison, there were no divisions between Catholics and Protestants -- all were simply Christian brothers.

Pastor Wurmbrand, whom I admired so much that I named my youngest daughter after his wife, Sabina, also observed that it sometimes took months before Catholic and Eastern Orthodox priests would even pray the "Our Father" together. Exclusiveness (a term I'll use because "hate" is so overdone these days) seems to have very deep roots in fallen human nature.

[annalex]

There are more than two sides in how the Christiandom is divided in the West.

While faithful to the Magisterium Catholics (not that there should be any other kind) have much that separates them from the cultural left, which fact brings us closer to the Evangelicals, the Catholic theology is opposed to Calvinism in any form. Therefore Catholics should be wary of any alliance-forming with the Protestants: the Protestant Left for its servility to the secular state, and the Protestant Right for its Calvinist roots.

[Desdemona]

And that is why many who disagree with Catholics on some points encourage dialogue with them, and vice-versa. Strange that this produces antagonism among people when they should be rejoicing that they can learn much from each other concerning differing viewpoints. After all, one can learn much from discussion with those who disagree with you.

As a Catholic who has had to relearn the Faith due to atrocious Catechesis, it is very helpful to study the writings of not just the doctors of the church, but the popes for explanations of why any certain teaching is so. It is a great disservice, IMO, the older and more aware we are, to simply teach bottom line dogma. "Why?" should always be answered. There are so many out there who are downright ignorant (in the root sense of the word) about what the Church really is and teaches (and I'm not talking about just protestants), it's pathetic.

One of the points in this article is that there are many "Catholics" who "disagree" (should be: have supplanted their opinion for truth) on various teachings, mostly for humanistic reasoning. They are the most virulent and outspoken critics of the Church. They want to see the Church "get with the times" and modernize. Every pope since Leo XIII (at least) in the 1880's (I'm thinking it goes back farther than that, but don't have the dates in front of me) has written encyclicals on why this cannot be. The Church is timeless and so much of tradition, attire, architecture, etc., should reflect that.

[Truth Defender]

"Why?" should always be answered.
The Church is timeless and so much of tradition, attire, architecture, etc., should reflect that.

And WHY is that?