But the purpose of the quote was that if Catholic Bishops accuse(that word again) a sitting Pope of the most vile crimes, accusations not beyond the realm of possibility, why is someone an anti-Catholic bigot or similar, if they list those same accusations? Or if I do from a Catholic source?
Were those Bishops liars, perjurers, bearing false witness?
All serious sins, or was it simply calling the kettle, etc.?
But as the other poster demanded sources and hard evidence or I be deemed a liar, yet offered not one, not one source or evidence what does that tell you? I'm still waiting for proof of the statements made, some source beyond opinion.
Here's an example:
“First, the Pope accused of this was Stephen VI, not Stephen VII.”
But they are listed as one and the same in the Catholic Encyclopedia.
So which one has proof? Who's lying? The poster or the ‘pedia?
Yeah, I want proof, but in all the replies so far to me I've not seen any, just opinions, name calling, and unsourced statements.
You must be kidding. You can't prove any historical event without video?