That’s quite a distortion.
I read extensive excerpts—pages and pages of excerpts.
NOT the whole books.
I didn’t read the evidence they provided layers and multiple sources for as
‘manipulated evidence.’
I can understand how someone with your biases would see it otherwise.
I remind you that for most of my 61 years, I considered Fatima to be more or less true as given in the Vatican version.
I’m not an idiot.
I’m not inexperienced.
I’m not an uncritical thinker.
I’m not low in IQ.
Something changed my mind.
It was the earliest, most candid Fatima evidence compared with a lot of stuff out of my 40+ years of studying the UFO phenomena.
You are free to deny whatever you wish about all that.
They did not come across to me as atheists nor as out to make a buck.
They came across to me as very curious about the subject and the more they investigated, the more they became determined to try and set the record straight.