1) I don’t know how much of the books I’d consider valid if I had them to read. The excerpts I read about the witnesses reports before they were distorted by the Jesuits and a lot of hoopla . . . were quite convincing.
2) I don’t know what your hangup thing is about robots.
3) INFLUENCE—persuasive INFLUENCE—does not require a robotic response per se. Often, all that’s necessary is a little nudge here and there to skew a person’s construction on reality in a desired direction. Doesn’t make the individuals concerned wholesale lock-step robots but does get them supporting the desired thing in the desired direction. And, makes them more vulnerable to such influences the next time.
4) I’m rather persistently dismayed (now that you seem so doggedly interested in robotic responses) of masses of people—I’m rather persistently dismayed at what comes across to this psychologist/sociologist as very robotic lock-step compliance in a list of ways WITHOUT A SHRED of critical thinking on the part of so many following the Vatican/Rome’s pontifications and edicts.
5) I have no personal evidence or puzzle pieces convincingly showing that there WERE or WERE NOT micro-aliens. An interesting idea. So now, folks can argue about how many aliens can stand on the head of a pin. Impressive.
You said if we believe in Fatima and The Blessed Mother some evil force was in charge of us .Hence we are robots with no free will.I said that your book that you were quoting from had a person who saw micro aliens from the web around the area and gosh that made you happy.Little aliens in the microscope.The strange thing is you never read the book which you could of picked up for a buck and now can not back up what what you said.I’ll send you all mine that I ordered from your suggestion -free.You go in circles Quix.