I've already mentioned the place in which I know Scripture only states that Christ should be that authority, not an Apostle, bishop, elder, overseer, etc. That is the problem area. However, you state that special documents, which you do not give in any reference, must have the supporting material for your position. I've looked at the few New Testament chapters mentioned, and they, in no way, describe something that supports the problem area mentioned in the article from Coleus.
It appears you don't have much of a case at this point, do you?
You stated
The Catholic church believes the Pope, the sinful man he is, is equivalent to Christ.You have not shown it. You have changed the subject. You have asked for documents. It appears that you are saying that I mentioned "special documents" as "supporting material for [my] position."
But my position in this discussion with you is that you have made a charge, quoted above, which is false. You make the charge. You support it.
I see no defense of your ridiculous charge yet. I see some other charges and other characterizations, but nothing to support or even excuse the initial charge. You did say something to the effect that you would "apologize" for the initial charge if we proved or disproved something else, but that makes no sense.