No sale, MD. Rebuke your own, publicly and by name, for not posting their own admissions of guilt "less than graciousness" to us.
I have publicly apologized for going over the top, and no I don't remember where or when. I thought I was bad at reckning up wrongs but I think I am indeed out of my league here..
Am I to understand that your position is that since some Catholics have been guilty of excessive language against some Protestants then no Protestant is to be held as having done the same thing? Or is it that we are to have champions for each side?
and here we go again:
I've never seen an admission or an apology from that responsible party of those comments being "over the line", with just one single, notable exception.
It may be hair-splitting to a Protestant, but to me that means that in fact you HAVE seen ONE notable admission or apology from that responsible party. I don't know the context, but it sounds like he's supposed to say it three times or something.
I got in this game because ALways Right said something which seemed to me to be untrue and then, when challenged, produced evidence which was not competent to answer the question. That's all.
Now that it has become bait and switch, and that Always Right's still unsubstantiated statement is being lost in "Am not!" and "Are too!" I think I'll go seek adult amusement.
I did not mean to drive you to porn. ;-}
The only bait and switch is by you, by inserting 'all' into the equation.
If more people walked the walk, it wouldn’t be a problem.