This sounds good on the surface and I am for the text itself. Critical analysis is a foundation of good science and should be promoted. Unfortunately, the the Discovery Institute is behind it so I know there's an underlying agenda to replace science with theology despite the text of the law.
Unfortunately, the the Discovery Institute is behind it so I know there’s an underlying agenda to replace science with theology despite the text of the law.
***Arguing against something because of who is for it or behind it is ad hominem argumentation, invalid.