Such games don't belong here. Go to peta.org and check out their position on eating meat, or circuses, or any animal-related topic if you honestly don't know. FTR, they promote veganism.
*I don’t know what DI’s core platform is either. So if I were you and I wanted to introduce it as evidence in ecumenical debates, I’d post it to the religion moderator and get it cleared as an established fact.
Here is where they admit authorship. In this document (which includes the Wedge Document) they try to backpedal and reinterpret the obvious meaning of the document. However, there is ample proof of the agenda in spite of this, the least of which is the general truism that you can trust the honesty of an organization's secret internal communications more than you can trust its public press releases (which will be spun).
In any case, back to the thread, the organization that sponsored the bill was pro-creationist and anti-evolution. The motive is obvious.
Go to peta.org and check out their position on eating meat, or circuses, or any animal-related topic if you honestly don’t know. FTR, they promote veganism.
***I have no desire to do so.
Here is where they admit authorship. In this document (which includes the Wedge Document) they try to backpedal and reinterpret the obvious meaning of the document.
***Religion Moderator, we’re going to need your feedback on the use of this document. Is it inflammatory? Is it accepted by both sides of the debate? Is it allowable in an ecumenical thread? There is a high likelihood that this subject in itself needs its own thread.
However, there is ample proof of the agenda in spite of this, the least of which is the general truism that you can trust the honesty of an organization’s secret internal communications more than you can trust its public press releases (which will be spun).
In any case, back to the thread, the organization that sponsored the bill was pro-creationist and anti-evolution. The motive is obvious.