Perhaps this will meet most if not all of your stringent criteria for caring.
Watch out, your straw man is showing!!!
1 - Please show where I even remotetly indicated that I did not care. If you go back to the other thread, you will note that I often use the words disgusting and ugly for sexual predators who call themselves clergy.
2 - This is not even close to the criteria I asked you for. Here is a slighly modified version of that criteria that I asked you to give proof that the scandal was as widestrpead in non-RCC church systems as it is in the RCC that you stated it was. I believe this is my third or maybe fouth time I have listed it. I hope you can read through it more thoroughy and understand it this time. Here is the criteria on how you can prove your statement:
Can you please give facts, FR links and article links that show the widespread, all the way up the corporate level church system that covers up and protects the abusers for years and years and years, knowing what the abusers continue to do, and even moving them to new congregations, knowing that they will likely repeat the abuse, knowing that they are protecting the sinners and not the innocent flock? And can you provide that same information for those church systems that only acted to remove the abusers from the presence of children because they were "found out" and the masses starting getting upset? If you can show that on a widespread basis, as is clearly what happened in the RCC, THEN, and only THEN, can you rightly accuse the protties of doing the same thing.
I will again request that you do not ping me, or have others ping me with individual pastors who are abusers. Second request on that.